Lo Sasso Anthony T, Lyons John S
Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 2040 Sheridan Rd, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):50-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02287338.
This study exploits variation in co-payment levels among different contractual arrangements within a regional managed behavioral health care organization to estimate the relationship between co-payment levels for substance use treatment services and the intensity of substance use treatment. The substance use treatment benefits involved a range of co-payment levels across nearly 400 employers during the years 1993 through 1998. Multiple regression techniques were used to estimate the effect of co-payment levels on treatment intensity. The results indicate that co-payment levels had a significant negative effect on outpatient and inpatient substance use treatment. For outpatient treatment the effect on intensity implied a co-payment elasticity of -0.18, implying that moving from a $10 co-payment to a $20 co-payment would result in, for example, a reduction from 5 to 4 outpatient visits per episode. However, the effect was larger for persons with combined alcohol and drug use disorders, as they exhibited a co-payment elasticity of -0.27. For inpatient days, the co-payment elasticity was considerably smaller at -0.017. Given the benefits of maintaining persons with substance use disorders in treatment, employers may have an incentive to take steps to minimize the barriers to treatment.
本研究利用一个地区性管理行为健康护理组织内不同合同安排下自付费用水平的差异,来估计物质使用治疗服务的自付费用水平与物质使用治疗强度之间的关系。在1993年至1998年期间,物质使用治疗福利涉及近400家雇主的一系列自付费用水平。采用多元回归技术来估计自付费用水平对治疗强度的影响。结果表明,自付费用水平对门诊和住院物质使用治疗有显著的负面影响。对于门诊治疗,对强度的影响意味着自付费用弹性为-0.18,这意味着例如将自付费用从10美元提高到20美元,每次发作的门诊就诊次数将从5次减少到4次。然而,对于同时患有酒精和药物使用障碍的人,影响更大,因为他们的自付费用弹性为-0.27。对于住院天数,自付费用弹性相当小,为-0.017。鉴于让患有物质使用障碍的人接受治疗有诸多益处,雇主可能有动力采取措施尽量减少治疗障碍。