• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短期药物滥用治疗成本与利用情况:一项多雇主分析

Short term drug abuse treatment costs and utilization: a multi-employer analysis.

作者信息

Goodman A C, Nishiura E, Hankin J R

机构信息

Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1998 Aug;36(8):1214-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199808000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-199808000-00009
PMID:9708593
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This report investigates three aspects of drug abuse treatment costs, with special emphasis on systematic differences among employers: (1) predictors of drug abuse treatment costs; (2) differentials in drug abuse treatment costs across employers; and (3) differential impacts of patient and employer characteristics on drug abuse treatment costs.

METHODS

The study used multiple regression analysis of behavioral cost functions. It decomposed cost differences into employer and variable effects using an algebraic method that accounted for differences in cost functions and in population characteristics. An insurance claims database was used from 10 large self-insured employers for a 3-year period starting January 1989.

RESULTS

Marginal inpatient costs generally exceeded average costs, leading to slightly increasing costs per day as length of stay increased. Marginal outpatient costs were generally about the same as average costs, implying that outpatient drug treatment maintained constant unit costs as utilization increased. Decomposition of cost differences among employers suggested that observed differences among employers and/or their carriers (who administer the benefits for the self-insured employers) and providers appeared to be at least as important as differences among the characteristics or the utilization of the people that they cover.

CONCLUSIONS

National health policies aimed at reducing costs are likely to have differing impacts on different employers. Employers with high costs relative to the characteristics of their covered population may be able to achieve significant cost savings. Employers serving populations with greater risk factors may find it difficult to cut costs further.

摘要

目标

本报告调查药物滥用治疗成本的三个方面,特别强调雇主之间的系统性差异:(1)药物滥用治疗成本的预测因素;(2)不同雇主之间药物滥用治疗成本的差异;(3)患者和雇主特征对药物滥用治疗成本的不同影响。

方法

该研究使用了行为成本函数的多元回归分析。它采用一种代数方法将成本差异分解为雇主效应和变量效应,该方法考虑了成本函数和人群特征的差异。使用了1989年1月开始的3年期间来自10家大型自保雇主的保险理赔数据库。

结果

边际住院成本通常超过平均成本,导致随着住院时间的增加,每日成本略有上升。边际门诊成本通常与平均成本大致相同,这意味着随着利用率的提高,门诊药物治疗的单位成本保持不变。雇主之间成本差异的分解表明,观察到的雇主及其承保人(为自保雇主管理福利)和提供者之间的差异似乎至少与他们所覆盖人群的特征或利用率差异一样重要。

结论

旨在降低成本的国家卫生政策可能对不同雇主产生不同影响。相对于其覆盖人群特征而言成本较高的雇主可能能够实现显著的成本节约。为风险因素较高的人群服务的雇主可能会发现进一步削减成本很困难。

相似文献

1
Short term drug abuse treatment costs and utilization: a multi-employer analysis.短期药物滥用治疗成本与利用情况:一项多雇主分析
Med Care. 1998 Aug;36(8):1214-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199808000-00009.
2
Pharmacy benefit spending on oral chemotherapy drugs.口服化疗药物的药房福利支出。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Sep;12(7):570-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.7.570.
3
The economic impact of bipolar disorder in an employed population from an employer perspective.从雇主角度看双相情感障碍对就业人群的经济影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;67(8):1209-18. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0806.
4
Spending trends on substance abuse treatment under private employer-sponsored insurance, 2001-2009.私营雇主赞助保险下的物质滥用治疗支出趋势,2001-2009 年。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Oct 1;125(3):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
5
The sensitivity of substance abuse treatment intensity to co-payment levels.药物滥用治疗强度对共付费用水平的敏感性。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):50-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02287338.
6
Costs and utilization of substance abuse care in a privately insured population under managed care.管理式医疗下私人保险人群中药物滥用护理的成本与利用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Dec;49(12):1573-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.12.1573.
7
A discrete choice model of drug abuse treatment location.药物滥用治疗地点的离散选择模型。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Apr;33(1):125-45.
8
Using health insurance claims data to analyze substance abuse charges and utilization.
Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Sep;53(3):350-68. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300308.
9
The data page. Employers turn to employees to contain costs.数据页面。雇主向员工施压以控制成本。
Hosp Health Netw. 2004 Jul;78(7):36.
10
Organizational and client determinants of cost in outpatient substance abuse treatment.门诊药物滥用治疗中成本的组织和客户决定因素。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):3-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining variation in treatment costs: a cost function for outpatient methadone treatment programs.审视治疗成本的差异:门诊美沙酮治疗项目的成本函数
Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun;43(3):931-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00799.x.
2
Alcohol interventions for trauma patients treated in emergency departments and hospitals: a cost benefit analysis.急诊科和医院中对创伤患者的酒精干预措施:成本效益分析。
Ann Surg. 2005 Apr;241(4):541-50. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000157133.80396.1c.