Bojke Chris, Gravelle Hugh, Hassell Karen, Whittington Zoe
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK.
Health Econ. 2004 Jan;13(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/hec.815.
We examine the effects of an intervention to provide easier access to pharmacists for patients with minor ailments. The intervention allowed pharmacists to prescribe and dispense medicines currently limited to general practitioners (GPs) without patients losing their right to free prescriptions. We show that the total number of GP consultations was unaffected by the intervention but that the proportion which were for minor ailments decreased. We also use estimate multinomial models of patient choices between GP and pharmacies and find that the main determinant is the type of minor ailment. Distance appears to have no effect on patient choice.
我们研究了一项干预措施的效果,该措施旨在让患有小病的患者更方便地咨询药剂师。这项干预措施允许药剂师开出处方并配发目前仅限全科医生(GP)开具的药品,而患者不会失去免费处方的权利。我们发现,全科医生会诊的总数不受该干预措施影响,但因小病进行的会诊比例有所下降。我们还使用多项估计模型研究了患者在全科医生和药房之间的选择,发现主要决定因素是小病的类型。距离似乎对患者的选择没有影响。