Suppr超能文献

应对英国的健康不平等问题:政策的进展与困境

Tackling health inequalities in the United Kingdom: the progress and pitfalls of policy.

作者信息

Exworthy Mark, Blane David, Marmot Michael

机构信息

University of California, Medical Effectiveness Research Center, San Francisco 94143-0856, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1905-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00208.x.

Abstract

GOAL

Assess the progress and pitfalls of current United Kingdom (U.K.) policies to reduce health inequalities.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Describe the context enabling health inequalities to get onto the policy agenda in the United Kingdom. (2) Categorize and assess selected current U.K. policies that may affect health inequalities. (3) Apply the "policy windows" model to understand the issues faced in formulating and implementing such policies. (4) Examine the emerging policy challenges in the U.K. and elsewhere.

DATA SOURCES

Official documents, secondary analyses, and interviews with policymakers.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative, policy analysis.

DATA COLLECTION

2001-2002. The methods were divided into two stages. The first identified policies which were connected with individual inquiry recommendations. The second involved case-studies of three policies areas which were thought to be crucial in tackling health inequalities. Both stages involved interviews with policymakers and documentary analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

(1) The current U.K. government stated a commitment to reducing health inequalities. (2) The government has begun to implement policies that address the wider determinants. (3) Some progress is evident but many indicators remain stubborn. (4) Difficulties remain in terms of coordinating policies across government and measuring progress. (5) The "policy windows" model explains the limited extent of progress and highlights current and possible future pitfalls. (6) The U.K.'s experience has lessons for other governments involved in tackling health inequalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Health inequalities are on the agenda of U.K. government policy and steps have been made to address them. There are some signs of progress but much remains to be done including overcoming some of the perverse incentives at the national level, improving joint working, ensuring appropriate measures of performance/progress, and improving monitoring arrangements. A conceptual policy model aids understanding and points to ways of sustaining and extending the recent progress and overcoming pitfalls.

摘要

目标

评估英国当前减少健康不平等政策的进展与困境。

目的

(1)描述促使健康不平等问题进入英国政策议程的背景。(2)对当前可能影响健康不平等的英国政策进行分类和评估。(3)应用“政策窗口”模型来理解制定和实施此类政策所面临的问题。(4)审视英国及其他地区新出现的政策挑战。

数据来源

官方文件、二次分析以及对政策制定者的访谈。

研究设计

定性政策分析。

数据收集

2001 - 2002年。方法分为两个阶段。第一阶段确定与个人调查建议相关的政策。第二阶段涉及对三个被认为在解决健康不平等问题中至关重要的政策领域进行案例研究。两个阶段均包括对政策制定者的访谈和文献分析。

主要发现

(1)英国现任政府表明致力于减少健康不平等。(2)政府已开始实施应对更广泛决定因素的政策。(3)有一些明显进展,但许多指标仍很棘手。(4)在跨政府协调政策和衡量进展方面仍存在困难。(5)“政策窗口”模型解释了进展有限的情况,并突出了当前及未来可能存在的困境。(6)英国的经验对其他致力于解决健康不平等问题的政府有借鉴意义。

结论

健康不平等已列入英国政府政策议程,并且已采取措施加以应对。有一些进展迹象,但仍有许多工作要做,包括克服国家层面的一些不良激励措施、改善联合工作、确保适当的绩效/进展衡量标准以及改进监测安排。一个概念性政策模型有助于理解,并指出维持和扩大近期进展以及克服困境的方法。

相似文献

5
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.
7
Tackling health inequalities since the Acheson inquiry.自艾奇逊调查以来应对健康不平等问题。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):262-3. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.010264.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
How policy informs the evidence.政策如何影响证据。
BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):184-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.184.
4
From evidence-based medicine to evidence-based policy?从循证医学到循证政策?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Apr;5(2):65-6. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500201.
5
The 39 steps: the mystery of health inequalities in the UK.《三十九级台阶:英国健康不平等之谜》
Health Econ. 1999 Jun;8(4):301-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199906)8:4<301::aid-hec446>3.0.co;2-t.
6
Commentary on the Acheson report.对艾奇逊报告的评论
Health Econ. 1999 Jun;8(4):297-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199906)8:4<297::aid-hec445>3.0.co;2-8.
7
Reducing health inequalities: Britain's latest attempt.减少健康不平等:英国的最新尝试。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 May-Jun;18(3):45-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.45.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验