Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Dec 1;39(4):653-660. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw140.
Politicians in many countries have embraced the notion that health inequalities derive from socioeconomic inequalities, but European governments have for the most part failed to enact policies that would reduce underlying social inequalities.
Data are drawn from 84 in-depth interviews with policy-makers in four European countries between 2012 and 2015, qualitative content analysis of recent health inequalities policy documents, and secondary literature on the barriers to implementing evidence-based health inequalities policies.
Institutional and political barriers are important barriers to effective policy. Both policy-making institutions and the ideas and practices associated with neoliberalism reinforce medical-individualist models of health, strengthen actors with material interests opposed to policies that would increase equity, and undermine policy action to tackle the fundamental causes of social (including health) inequalities.
Medicalizing inequality is more appealing to most politicians than tackling income and wage inequality head-on, but it results in framing the problem of social inequality in a way that makes it technically quite difficult to solve. Policy-makers should consider adopting more traditional programs of taxation, redistribution and labor market regulation in order to reduce both health inequalities and the underlying social inequalities.
许多国家的政客都接受了这样一种观点,即健康不平等源于社会经济不平等,但欧洲各国政府在很大程度上未能制定能够减少潜在社会不平等的政策。
本研究的数据来自于 2012 年至 2015 年间对四个欧洲国家的政策制定者进行的 84 次深入访谈,对最近的健康不平等政策文件进行了定性内容分析,并对实施循证健康不平等政策的障碍进行了二次文献研究。
制度和政治障碍是有效政策的重要障碍。政策制定机构以及与新自由主义相关的思想和实践都强化了医疗个人主义的健康模式,增强了与增加公平性政策相对立的利益相关者的实力,并破坏了解决社会(包括健康)不平等根本原因的政策行动。
将不平等医学化对大多数政客来说比对直接解决收入和工资不平等更具吸引力,但这导致了以一种在技术上相当难以解决的方式来构建社会不平等问题。政策制定者应该考虑采取更传统的税收、再分配和劳动力市场监管方案,以减少健康不平等和潜在的社会不平等。