• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A proposed ontology for online healthcare surveys.一种针对在线医疗保健调查的本体论建议。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:304-9.
2
Healthcare @ the speed of thought.医疗保健,与思维同步。
Integr Healthc Rep. 1999 May:1-14, 16-7.
3
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.通过网络调查临床医生:设计和管理中的当前问题。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630.
4
Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics in the Web 3.0 Era: Standards for data, curricula, and activities. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group on Health and Medical Informatics Education.Web 3.0时代生物医学与健康信息学教育:数据、课程与活动标准。国际医学信息学协会健康与医学信息学教育工作组的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2011;6:139-41.
5
What is found positive in healthcare information and communication technology implementation?-the results of a nationwide survey in Finland.在医疗保健信息和通信技术实施中发现了什么积极因素?——芬兰全国性调查的结果。
Telemed J E Health. 2011 Mar;17(2):118-23. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0138.
6
Developing the online survey.开展在线调查。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;43(4):605-19, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2008.06.011.
7
Challenges using online surveys in a Danish population of people with type 2 diabetes.在丹麦2型糖尿病患者群体中使用在线调查的挑战。
Chronic Illn. 2012 Mar;8(1):56-63. doi: 10.1177/1742395311413307. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
8
Delivering healthcare information via the internet: cardiac patients' access, usage, perceptions of usefulness, and web site content preferences.通过互联网提供医疗保健信息:心脏病患者的访问、使用、有用性认知及网站内容偏好。
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Mar;20(3):223-7; quiz 228. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0182. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
9
Associations between Internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study.基于互联网的患者评分与英国国民保健制度中常规患者体验调查之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):600-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000906. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
10
Mobile healthcare services in school-based health center.校本健康中心的移动医疗服务。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jun;78(6):425-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Need for a New Instrument to Evaluate Canadian Physiotherapy Students during Clinical Education Experiences.审视在临床教育经历中评估加拿大物理治疗专业学生是否需要一种新工具。
Physiother Can. 2016;68(2):151-155. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-89E.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology.通过了解患者偏好改善医疗保健:计算机技术的作用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 May-Jun;5(3):257-62. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050257.

一种针对在线医疗保健调查的本体论建议。

A proposed ontology for online healthcare surveys.

作者信息

Huq Syed Z, Karras Bryant T

机构信息

Department of Medical Education & Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington Schools of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:304-9.

PMID:14728183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1480110/
Abstract

This paper results from the research efforts of the Clinical Informatics Research Group in building a generalized system for online survey implementation. Key to the success of any generalized survey system is a standard ontology for the differing components of any survey, particularly those sought to be implemented online, over the World Wide Web. In this paper, we introduce the need for generalized survey authoring tools, discuss our methods for elucidating the different components present in many healthcare instruments and classifying them as per existing standards, and later present our proposed ontology for online surveys in the healthcare domain. This is followed by a more detailed description of the different question types mentioned in this ontology. Finally, we compare some general purpose authoring systems currently available to determine their flexibility in representing these disparate question types (www.cirg.washington.edu/SuML).

摘要

本文源自临床信息学研究小组构建在线调查实施通用系统的研究工作。任何通用调查系统成功的关键在于为任何调查的不同组件建立标准本体,特别是那些试图通过万维网在线实施的调查。在本文中,我们介绍了通用调查创作工具的必要性,讨论了我们阐明许多医疗保健工具中存在的不同组件并根据现有标准对其进行分类的方法,随后展示了我们为医疗保健领域在线调查提出的本体。接着对该本体中提到的不同问题类型进行了更详细的描述。最后,我们比较了目前可用的一些通用创作系统,以确定它们在表示这些不同问题类型方面的灵活性(www.cirg.washington.edu/SuML)。