Babcock Julia C, Green Charles E, Robie Chet
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77204-5022, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;23(8):1023-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001.
This meta-analytic review examines the findings of 22 studies evaluating treatment efficacy for domestically violent males. The outcome literature of controlled quasi-experimental and experimental studies was reviewed to test the relative impact of Duluth model, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and other types of treatment on subsequent recidivism of violence. Study design and type of treatment were tested as moderators. Treatment design tended to have a small influence on effect size. There were no differences in effect sizes in comparing Duluth model vs. CBT-type interventions. Overall, effects due to treatment were in the small range, meaning that the current interventions have a minimal impact on reducing recidivism beyond the effect of being arrested. Analogies to treatment for other populations are presented for comparison. Implications for policy decisions and future research are discussed.
这项荟萃分析综述考察了22项评估针对家庭暴力男性治疗效果的研究结果。对对照准实验和实验研究的结果文献进行了回顾,以检验德卢斯模式、认知行为疗法(CBT)及其他类型治疗对后续暴力累犯的相对影响。研究设计和治疗类型作为调节因素进行了检验。治疗设计对效应量的影响往往较小。在比较德卢斯模式与CBT类干预措施时,效应量没有差异。总体而言,治疗产生的效果处于较小范围,这意味着当前的干预措施对减少累犯的影响极小,超出了被捕的影响。还给出了针对其他人群治疗的类比以供比较。讨论了对政策决策和未来研究的启示。