Zhang Youhua, Bharati Saroja, Sulayman Rabi, Mowrey Kent A, Tchou Patrick J, Mazgalev Todor N
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Research Building FF1-02, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Jan 1;61(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.10.023.
Atrioventricular node (AVN) modification is one of the alternatives for ventricular rate control in patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the underlying mechanisms, and in particular the role of the dual pathway electrophysiology is not clear. By using a novel index, His electrogram (HE) alternans, we have previously demonstrated in rabbits that both the slow (SP) and the fast pathways (FP) are involved in AVN conduction during AF. This electrophysiological-morphological study was designed to address the role of selective FP ablation on AVN conduction during AF.
In 12 rabbit AVN preparations dual pathway conduction was confirmed by HE alternans during A1A2 pacing protocol, as well as during AF. On average 48% of the conducted beats during AF utilized the FP. Selective FP ablation (n=12) guided by HE alternans resulted in only-SP conduction, with longer AVN conduction time at basic beats, but without change of AVN effective refractory period (ERP). Interestingly, despite elimination of all FP-conducted beats during AF, the selective FP ablation allowed previously concealed SP beats to be conducted, resulting in little net effect on the ventricular rate (average His-His interval 199+/-10 ms before versus 201+/-13 ms after FP ablation, p>0.05). Morphological evidence indicated that FP ablation created lesions within the transitional cells of the superior approaches at the junction between the central fibrous body and the AVN. However, extension of FP ablation lesion into the compact AVN domain resulted in non-selective AVN modification and slowing of ventricular rate during AF.
Despite its longer ERP, FP is responsible for a substantial number of ventricular beats during AF. However, selective FP ablation has a minor effect on ventricular rate. The most likely mechanism for this phenomenon is that FP ablation allows previously concealed SP beats to be conducted. On the other hand, ventricular rate slowdown could be achieved if FP ablations caused collateral damage in the compact node. This study highlights the usefulness of HE alternans as a novel tool to monitor dual pathway conduction during AF and to guide AVN modification.
房室结(AVN)改良术是药物难治性心房颤动(AF)患者心室率控制的替代方法之一。然而,其潜在机制,尤其是双径路电生理学的作用尚不清楚。通过使用一种新的指标,希氏束电图(HE)交替现象,我们之前在兔子身上证明,在房颤期间,慢径路(SP)和快径路(FP)均参与房室结传导。本电生理形态学研究旨在探讨选择性快径路消融在房颤期间对房室结传导的作用。
在12只兔房室结标本中,通过A1A2起搏方案以及房颤期间的HE交替现象证实了双径路传导。房颤期间平均48%的下传搏动利用快径路。在HE交替现象引导下进行选择性快径路消融(n = 12),结果仅出现慢径路传导,基础搏动时房室结传导时间延长,但房室结有效不应期(ERP)无变化。有趣的是,尽管在房颤期间消除了所有通过快径路传导的搏动,但选择性快径路消融使之前隐匿的慢径路搏动得以传导,对心室率的净影响很小(快径路消融前希氏束-希氏束间期平均为199±10 ms,消融后为201±13 ms,p>0.05)。形态学证据表明,快径路消融在中央纤维体与房室结交界处的上方径路过渡细胞内形成了损伤。然而,快径路消融损伤延伸至致密房室结区域会导致非选择性房室结改良以及房颤期间心室率减慢。
尽管快径路的有效不应期较长,但在房颤期间它仍负责相当数量的心室搏动。然而,选择性快径路消融对心室率的影响较小。这种现象最可能的机制是快径路消融使之前隐匿的慢径路搏动得以传导。另一方面,如果快径路消融在致密结区造成附带损伤,则可实现心室率减慢。本研究强调了HE交替现象作为一种新工具在监测房颤期间双径路传导以及指导房室结改良方面的有用性。