• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳产业工人对事故发生的因果归因:矿工与非矿工视角

Causal attributions of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence: miners and non-miners perspective.

作者信息

Gyekye Seth Ayim

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, Neitsytsaarentie 8 D 22, 00960 96 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2003;34(5):533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.002
PMID:14733987
Abstract

PROBLEM

Reports from the accident literature indicate that accident rates tend to vary with type of occupation. The mining industry has been recorded as the most dangerous with a high disabling injury rate. This observation has been attributed to the extremely stressful conditions under which miners work. Besides, the intimidating work environment in the mines has been insinuated to invoke a sense of helplessness, fatalism and hence defensive causal attributions for accident occurrences.

METHOD

This study compared causal attributions between accident victims in Ghana's mining industry with their counterparts in textile factories. T values and Chi-square were employed to test for statistically significant differences between the two groups of accident victims.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that there is no difference between the causal attributions for miners and non-miners.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

Accident frequency and occupational type have no impact on causal attributions.

摘要

问题

事故文献报告表明,事故发生率往往因职业类型而异。采矿业被记录为最危险的行业,致残伤害率很高。这一观察结果归因于矿工工作时极端紧张的条件。此外,有人暗示矿井中令人生畏的工作环境会引发无助感、宿命论,从而导致对事故发生的防御性因果归因。

方法

本研究比较了加纳采矿业事故受害者与纺织厂事故受害者的因果归因。采用T值和卡方检验来检验两组事故受害者之间的统计学显著差异。

结果

研究结果表明,矿工和非矿工的因果归因没有差异。

对行业的影响

事故频率和职业类型对因果归因没有影响。

相似文献

1
Causal attributions of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence: miners and non-miners perspective.加纳产业工人对事故发生的因果归因:矿工与非矿工视角
J Safety Res. 2003;34(5):533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.002.
2
Examining psychosocial and physical hazards in the Ghanaian mining industry and their implications for employees' safety experience.探讨加纳采矿业中的心理社会和物理危害及其对员工安全体验的影响。
J Safety Res. 2013 Jun;45:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
3
Responsibility assignment at the workplace: a Finnish and Ghanaian perspective.工作场所的责任分配:芬兰和加纳的视角。
Scand J Psychol. 2005 Feb;46(1):43-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00433.x.
4
The relation between shift work, sleepiness, fatigue and accidents in Iranian Industrial Mining Group workers.伊朗工业矿业集团工人的轮班工作、嗜睡、疲劳与事故之间的关系。
Ind Health. 2009 Apr;47(2):134-8. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.47.134.
5
From awareness to action: Sudbury, mining and occupational disease in a time of change.从认知到行动:变革时代的萨德伯里、采矿业与职业病
Work. 2017;58(2):149-162. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172610.
6
Occupational injuries and fatalities in copper mining in Zambia.赞比亚铜矿开采中的职业伤害和死亡。
Occup Med (Lond). 2009 May;59(3):191-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp009. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
7
The added value of the new ESAW/Eurostat variables in accident analysis in the mining and quarrying industry.
J Safety Res. 2008;39(6):631-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
8
Influence of occupational safety management on the incidence rate of occupational accidents in the Spanish industrial and ornamental stone mining.职业安全管理对西班牙工业及装饰性石材开采中职业事故发生率的影响。
Work. 2014;49(2):307-14. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141854.
9
Exploratory analysis of Spanish energetic mining accidents.西班牙能源矿业事故的探索性分析。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2012;18(2):209-19. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2012.11076929.
10
Estimation of the risk of work-related accidents for underground hard coal mine workers by logistic regression.运用逻辑回归对地下硬煤矿工人的工作相关事故风险进行评估。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2362-2369. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1990571. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Erosion of Healthcare and Scientific Integrity: A Growing Concern.医疗保健与科学诚信的侵蚀:日益令人担忧的问题。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Feb 21;17:23-43. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S506767. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk of Silico-Tuberculosis in Miners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.矿工中硅肺结核的风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):296-302. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_287_22. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
3
Data mining of accidents in Spanish underground mines in the period 2003-2021 caused by a collision with a moving object.
对2003年至2021年期间西班牙地下矿井中因与移动物体碰撞而导致的事故进行数据挖掘。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 19;10(2):e24716. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24716. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
4
Analysis of Occupational Accidents in the Spanish Mining Sector in the Period 2009-2018.2009-2018 年西班牙采矿业职业事故分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 12;18(24):13122. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413122.
5
Modern Cause and Effect Model by Factors of Root Cause for Accident Prevention in Small to Medium Sized Enterprises.基于根本原因因素的现代因果模型在中小企业事故预防中的应用
Saf Health Work. 2021 Dec;12(4):505-510. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Injury rate and risk factors among small-scale gold miners in Ghana.加纳小规模金矿工人的受伤率和危险因素。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 24;19(1):1368. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7560-0.
7
Analysis of a Historical Accident in a Spanish Coal Mine.西班牙一煤矿历史事故分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 26;16(19):3615. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193615.
8
Analysis of Injuries in the Ghanaian Mining Industry and Priority Areas for Research.加纳采矿业的伤害分析及优先研究领域
Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):151-165. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Experiences of frontline nursing staff on workplace safety and occupational health hazards in two psychiatric hospitals in Ghana.加纳两家精神病院一线护理人员的工作场所安全和职业健康危害体验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 6;18(1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5620-5.
10
Analysis of Occupational Accidents in Underground and Surface Mining in Spain Using Data-Mining Techniques.利用数据挖掘技术分析西班牙地下和露天采矿中的职业事故。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 7;15(3):462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030462.