Halvani Gholam Hossein, Zare Mohsen, Mirmohammadi Seyed Jalil
Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 8916116499, Iran.
Ind Health. 2009 Apr;47(2):134-8. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.47.134.
The aim of this study was to examine the rate of fatigue and sleepiness around the shift and non-shift workers and its relation to occupational accidents. This was a cross-sectional study on the workers of Iranian Industrial Mining Group. They included 137 shift workers as the case and 130 non-shift workers as the control. A multi-part questionnaire including demographic characteristics, Piper Fatigue Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale were applied. The chi(2) test and t-test were used to measure differences between variables. The mean of PFS scores in the two groups was significantly different (p=0.045), but the difference in the mean of ESS scores was not significant. Shift workers with the reported accident had a higher score on fatigue than shift workers with no accident (p<0.001) whereas the difference in the number of accidents in the two groups was not related significantly to the rate of sleepiness. The rate of fatigue and the number of the work accidents was more in the shift workers. Also, fatigue had a stronger relationship with the occupational accidents as compared to sleepiness. It seems that evaluation of fatigue as compared to sleepiness is a more accurate factor for preventing work accidents.
本研究旨在调查轮班工人和非轮班工人的疲劳和嗜睡发生率及其与职业事故的关系。这是一项针对伊朗工业矿业集团工人的横断面研究。研究对象包括137名轮班工人作为病例组和130名非轮班工人作为对照组。采用了一份包含人口统计学特征、派珀疲劳量表和爱泼华嗜睡量表的多部分问卷。使用卡方检验和t检验来测量变量之间的差异。两组的PFS评分均值有显著差异(p = 0.045),但ESS评分均值的差异不显著。报告有事故的轮班工人的疲劳得分高于无事故的轮班工人(p < 0.001),而两组事故数量的差异与嗜睡发生率无显著相关性。轮班工人的疲劳发生率和工作事故数量更高。此外,与嗜睡相比,疲劳与职业事故的关系更强。与嗜睡相比,评估疲劳似乎是预防工作事故的更准确因素。