Graham Cynthia A, Catania Joseph A, Brand Richard, Duong Tu, Canchola Jesse A
The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Morrison Hall 313, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
J Sex Res. 2003 Nov;40(4):325-32. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552198.
This study examined the effect of time lag on the validity of retrospective self-reports of sexual behavior. Seventy-five heterosexual students (44 women, 31 men) made daily recordings of sexual behavior, condom use, and alcohol or substance use for 1 month. Ability of respondents to recall sexual behavior recorded during this period was assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months after diary completion using recall interviews (25 interviewed at each interval). For vaginal intercourse, total recall error was significantly greater at 3 months than at 1 month post-diary. For all other variables assessed, the 2- and 3-month time intervals did not produce significant increase in total recall error. Higher frequency of vaginal intercourse, orgasm, and alcohol use prior to sexual activity were associated with total recall error for some but not all behaviors and outcomes. The results provide a partial validation of the diary-interview recall model as a method for studying recall error.
本研究考察了时间间隔对性行为回顾性自我报告有效性的影响。75名异性恋学生(44名女性,31名男性)连续1个月每天记录性行为、避孕套使用情况以及酒精或药物使用情况。在日记记录完成后的1个月、2个月和3个月,通过回忆访谈(每个时间间隔访谈25人)评估受访者回忆在此期间记录的性行为的能力。对于阴道性交,日记记录后3个月的总回忆误差显著大于1个月时。对于评估的所有其他变量,2个月和3个月的时间间隔并未使总回忆误差显著增加。性活动前较高频率的阴道性交、性高潮和酒精使用与部分而非所有行为及结果的总回忆误差相关。研究结果部分验证了日记-访谈回忆模型作为一种研究回忆误差的方法。