Brennan Paul, Buffler Patricia A, Reynolds Peggy, Wu Anna H, Wichmann H Erich, Agudo Antonio, Pershagen Göran, Jöckel Karl-Heinz, Benhamou Simone, Greenberg Raymond S, Merletti Franco, Winck Carlos, Fontham Elizabeth T H, Kreuzer Michaela, Darby Sarah C, Forastiere Francesco, Simonato Lorenzo, Boffetta Paolo
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Int J Cancer. 2004 Mar;109(1):125-31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11682.
The interpretation of the evidence linking exposure to secondhand smoke with lung cancer is constrained by the imprecision of risk estimates. The objective of the study was to obtain precise and valid estimates of the risk of lung cancer in never smokers following exposure to secondhand smoke, including adjustment for potential confounders and exposure misclassification. Pooled analysis of data from 2 previously reported large case-control studies was used. Subjects included 1263 never smoking lung cancer patients and 2740 population and hospital controls recruited during 1985-1994 from 5 metropolitan areas in the United States, 11 areas in Germany, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom, France, Spain and Portugal. Odds ratios (ORs) of lung cancer were calculated for ever exposure and duration of exposure to secondhand smoke from spouse, workplace and social sources. The OR for ever exposure to spousal smoking was 1.18 (95% CI = 1.01-1.37) and for long-term exposure was 1.23 (95% CI = 1.01-1.51). After exclusion of proxy interviews, the OR for ever exposure from the workplace was 1.16 (95% CI = 0.99-1.36) and for long-term exposure was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.03-1.57). Similar results were obtained for exposure from social settings and for exposure from combined sources. A dose-response relationship was present with increasing duration of exposure to secondhand smoke for all 3 sources, with an OR of 1.32 (95% CI = 1.10-1.79) for the long-term exposure from all sources. There was no evidence of confounding by employment in high-risk occupations, education or low vegetable intake. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of misclassification (both positive and negative) indicated that the observed risks are likely to underestimate the true risk. Clear dose-response relationships consistent with a causal association were observed between exposure to secondhand smoke from spousal, workplace and social sources and the development of lung cancer among never smokers.
将接触二手烟与肺癌联系起来的证据解读受到风险估计不精确性的限制。本研究的目的是获得从未吸烟者接触二手烟后患肺癌风险的精确且有效的估计值,包括对潜在混杂因素和暴露错误分类进行调整。使用了对之前两项已报道的大型病例对照研究数据的汇总分析。研究对象包括1263名从未吸烟的肺癌患者以及1985年至1994年期间从美国5个大都市地区、德国11个地区、意大利、瑞典、英国、法国、西班牙和葡萄牙招募的2740名来自普通人群和医院的对照者。计算了来自配偶、工作场所和社交场合的二手烟暴露史及暴露时长与肺癌的比值比(OR)。配偶吸烟暴露史的OR为1.18(95%可信区间 = 1.01 - 1.37),长期暴露的OR为1.23(95%可信区间 = 1.01 - 1.51)。排除代理访谈后,工作场所暴露史的OR为1.16(95%可信区间 = 0.99 - 1.36),长期暴露的OR为1.27(95%可信区间 = 1.03 - 1.57)。社交场合暴露及综合来源暴露也得到了类似结果。对于所有3种来源,随着二手烟暴露时长增加均呈现剂量反应关系,所有来源长期暴露的OR为1.32(95%可信区间 = 1.10 - 1.79)。没有证据表明从事高风险职业、教育程度或蔬菜摄入量低会产生混杂作用。对错误分类(包括正向和负向)影响的敏感性分析表明,观察到的风险可能低估了真实风险。在配偶、工作场所和社交场合的二手烟暴露与从未吸烟者患肺癌之间观察到了与因果关联一致的明确剂量反应关系。