Kiebert Gwendoline M, Jonas Deborah L, Middleton Mark R
MEDTAP International, Inc., London, UK.
Cancer Invest. 2003;21(6):821-9. doi: 10.1081/cnv-120025084.
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a crucial endpoint in the evaluation of treatments that have limited survival benefits. The HRQL evaluations help ensure that patients are not sacrificing life quality for quantity. Current treatments for metastatic melanoma are primarily palliative, because cure is unattainable. The purpose of this article is to report detailed HRQL results of a phase III clinical trial comparing temozolomide to dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive either oral temozolomide for 5 days every 4 weeks or intravenous DTIC for 5 days every 3 weeks. The HRQL was evaluated on day 1 cycle 1 and after each subsequent treatment cycle using the EORTC QLQ-C-30. The HRQL was compared between groups at weeks 12 and 24. Patients treated with temozolomide reported significantly better physical functioning and less fatigue and sleep disturbances than patients treated with DTIC at week 12. For all but two function and symptom subscales, EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale scores were numerically better for patients treated with temozolomide at week 12. All subscales except diarrhea were better for temozolomide at week 24. Analyses of change scores revealed that patients treated with temozolomide reported statistically significant improvements in emotional well-being and sleep disturbance. Patients also reported near significant change in cognitive functioning (3.9, p = 0.06). Patients treated with DTIC deteriorated on most function subscales and many symptom subscales at week 12. Deterioration in physical functioning approached significance (-6.8, p = 0.06). At week 24, patients treated with DTIC improved on the emotional functioning subscale and deteriorated on the physical, role, and global HRQL subscales, although many of the symptom scores improved. The results of this study suggest that treatment with temozolomide leads to important functional improvements and decreased symptoms compared to treatment with DTIC in patients being treated for metastatic melanoma.
健康相关生活质量(HRQL)是评估生存获益有限的治疗方法的关键终点。HRQL评估有助于确保患者不会为了生存数量而牺牲生活质量。转移性黑色素瘤的现有治疗主要是姑息性的,因为无法治愈。本文的目的是报告一项III期临床试验的详细HRQL结果,该试验比较了替莫唑胺与达卡巴嗪(DTIC)治疗转移性黑色素瘤患者的效果。患者被随机分为两组,一组每4周口服替莫唑胺5天,另一组每3周静脉注射DTIC 5天。在第1周期第1天和随后的每个治疗周期后,使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C-30)评估HRQL。在第12周和第24周比较两组的HRQL。在第12周时,接受替莫唑胺治疗的患者报告的身体功能明显更好,疲劳和睡眠障碍比接受DTIC治疗的患者更少。除了两个功能和症状子量表外,在第12周时,接受替莫唑胺治疗的患者的EORTC QLQ-C30子量表得分在数值上更好。在第24周时,除腹泻外,替莫唑胺治疗的所有子量表情况更好。变化分数分析显示,接受替莫唑胺治疗的患者在情绪健康和睡眠障碍方面有统计学上的显著改善。患者在认知功能方面也报告了接近显著的变化(3.9,p = 0.06)。在第12周时,接受DTIC治疗的患者在大多数功能子量表和许多症状子量表上情况恶化。身体功能的恶化接近显著水平(-6.8,p = 0.06)。在第24周时,接受DTIC治疗的患者在情绪功能子量表上有所改善,但在身体、角色和总体HRQL子量表上情况恶化,尽管许多症状得分有所改善。这项研究的结果表明,与DTIC治疗相比,替莫唑胺治疗转移性黑色素瘤患者可带来重要的功能改善并减轻症状。