Basile Carlo, Ruggieri Giovanni, Vernaglione Luigi, Montanaro Alessio, Giordano Rosa
Division of Nephrology, Hospital of Martina Franca, Taranto, Italy.
J Nephrol. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):908-13.
NKF K-DOQI clinical practice guidelines recommend a regular monitoring of vascular access (VA) through several methods, such as VA recirculation (AR). Assessment of AR is crucial to avoid inefficiency of hemodialysis (HD). A non-urea based method has been developed (ultrasound dilution Transonics Hemodialysis Monitor--USM) which is considered the gold standard together with the two needle revised slow-stop-flow BUN recirculation method (S/SF). Furthermore, some other indicator dilution techniques, utilizing the dilution of serum potassium (K), glucose, hematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin (Hb) have been recently described.
Aim of the study was to compare some of these tests with the gold standards (the USM and the revised S/SF methods). One hundred-five adult HD patients were selected to participate; all had autogenous radiocephalic wrist arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Studies included the assessment of AR by means of: A. non-urea based methods: 1. at the start of HD a blood sample was obtained from the arterial needle at the time of needle insertion for the measurement of serum K, Hb and Hct (respectively K1, Hb1 and Hct1). The blood circuit was connected and the pumping of blood was started at 200 mL/min. After 18 seconds, blood samples were drawn from the arterial line sampling port (K2, Hb2, Hct2). At this time, if AR is present, part of the saline entering the blood stream will dilute K2, Hb2, Hct2.AR (%) is =100 x (1 - Hb2/Hb1) in the case of Hb; 2. during the first 30 min USM was performed in triplicate (the blood pump rate was set to 300 mL/min); B. a urea based method: the revised S/SF method was performed at 30 min.
AR was absent when measured by means of the USM; it was absent even when cannulating the patients with the two needles placed as close as possible. AR measured by means of the USM was significantly different from AR measured by means of the other methods (means +/- SD, one-way analysis of variance, p < 0.0001).
AR in autogenous radiocephalic wrist AVFs was zero when measured by means of the USM; the revised S/SF method and the tests employing the dilution of Hb, Hct and serum K can be considered a valuable alternative to the USM.
美国国家肾脏基金会(NKF)的肾脏疾病预后质量倡议(K - DOQI)临床实践指南建议通过多种方法定期监测血管通路(VA),如VA再循环(AR)。AR的评估对于避免血液透析(HD)效率低下至关重要。一种非基于尿素的方法已被开发出来(超声稀释Transonics血液透析监测仪——USM),它与两针改良慢停流尿素氮再循环方法(S/SF)一起被视为金标准。此外,最近还描述了一些其他利用血清钾(K)、葡萄糖、血细胞比容(Hct)和血红蛋白(Hb)稀释的指示剂稀释技术。
本研究的目的是将其中一些检测方法与金标准(USM和改良的S/SF方法)进行比较。选择了105例成年HD患者参与研究;所有患者均有自体桡动脉 - 头静脉内瘘(AVF)。研究包括通过以下方式评估AR:A. 非基于尿素的方法:1. 在HD开始时,在穿刺动脉针时从动脉针处采集血样,用于测量血清K、Hb和Hct(分别为K1、Hb1和Hct1)。连接血液回路并以200 mL/min的速度开始泵血。18秒后,从动脉管路采样端口采集血样(K2、Hb2、Hct2)。此时,如果存在AR,进入血流的部分盐水会稀释K2、Hb2、Hct2。对于Hb,AR(%)=100×(1 - Hb2/Hb1);2. 在最初30分钟内,对USM进行三次重复测量(血泵速度设置为300 mL/min);B. 基于尿素的方法:在30分钟时进行改良的S/SF方法。
通过USM测量时不存在AR;即使将两根针尽可能靠近患者进行穿刺时也不存在AR。通过USM测量的AR与通过其他方法测量的AR有显著差异(均值±标准差,单因素方差分析,p < 0.0001)。
通过USM测量时,自体桡动脉 - 头静脉内瘘的AR为零;改良的S/SF方法以及采用Hb、Hct和血清K稀释的检测方法可被视为USM的有价值替代方法。