Suppr超能文献

葡萄糖泵试验与尿素试验在测量血液通路血流量方面的比较。

Comparison of glucose pump test and urea test in measuring blood access flow.

作者信息

Alloatti Sandro, Magnasco Aalberto, Bonfant Giovanna, Pellu Valentina, Paroli Virna

机构信息

Nephrology and Dialysis Unit of Aosta, Italy.

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):559-64.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Glucose Pump Test (GPT) is a new method for measuring the access blood flow (Qa) based on a constant glucose infusion (Qi), with known glucose concentration (Ci), in the arterial needle and on glucose determination in two blood samples from the venous needle, the first (C1) in basal conditions, the second (C2) during the infusion. Qa depends on the difference in glucose between the two samples and is computed from the formula: QaGPT = Qi x (Ci-C2)/(C2-C1).

METHODS

The new method, previously evaluated by ultrasound dilution and color-Doppler techniques, was compared with the Urea Test (UT) in 20 patients measuring recirculation (R) during reversal of the arterial and venous needles (QaUT = Qb x (1/R -1)). All Qa determinations were done twice by both methods. Glucose and urea were determined respectively two and three times.

RESULTS

Mean QaGPT = 841, SD 347 ml/min, mean QaUT = 872, SD 417 ml/min (p = n.s.); mean percent difference QaGPT-QaUT= 16%, SD 14; mean coefficients of variation of paired determinations: 8.1% and 12.1% respectively; Pearson coefficient between the two methods: r= 0.91.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison showed a good correlation between the two methods and similar mean values. The coefficient of variation of the new method was acceptable and lower than with the UT. The GPT is a reliable technique for measuring blood flow in vascular accesses.

摘要

背景

葡萄糖泵试验(GPT)是一种基于恒定葡萄糖输注(Qi)来测量通路血流量(Qa)的新方法,动脉穿刺针处葡萄糖浓度(Ci)已知,通过测定静脉穿刺针处两个血样中的葡萄糖来计算Qa,第一个血样(C1)为基础状态下的,第二个血样(C2)为输注期间的。Qa取决于两个样本之间的葡萄糖差异,并通过以下公式计算:QaGPT = Qi×(Ci - C2)/(C2 - C1)。

方法

该新方法先前已通过超声稀释和彩色多普勒技术进行评估,在20例患者中与尿素试验(UT)进行比较,在动脉和静脉穿刺针反转期间测量再循环(R)(QaUT = Qb×(1/R - 1))。两种方法对所有Qa测定均进行两次。葡萄糖和尿素分别测定两次和三次。

结果

QaGPT均值 = 841,标准差347 ml/分钟,QaUT均值 = 872,标准差417 ml/分钟(p = 无显著差异);QaGPT - QaUT的平均百分比差异 = 16%,标准差14;配对测定的平均变异系数分别为8.1%和12.1%;两种方法之间的Pearson系数:r = 0.91。

结论

比较显示两种方法之间具有良好的相关性且均值相似。新方法的变异系数可接受且低于UT。GPT是一种测量血管通路血流量的可靠技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验