Selvan V T, Oakley M J, Rangan A, Al-Lami M K
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic, Middlesbrough General Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Injury. 2004 Feb;35(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(03)00059-7.
The radiographs of a sample of patients who had canulated hip screw fixation for intracapsular femoral neck fractures were reviewed in our region. There were six different types of configurations used in these fixations which are divided into two groups: (I) triangular configurations, consisting of two parallel screws with a third screw placed either superiorly, inferiorly, anteriorly or posteriorly; and (II) linear configurations with two or three screws in a vertical line. In our study, we tested the relative strength of each configuration in a laboratory setting using synthetic bone models. Statistical analysis, at 5% significance level, using two-way ANOVA and post-hoc test was carried out to test the differences of the results between the configurations.Our results clearly show that the triangular configurations had a higher peak load, higher ultimate load, less displacement and more energy absorption before failure than other configurations.
我们对本地区行髋关节螺钉内固定治疗囊内股骨颈骨折的患者样本的X线片进行了回顾。这些固定方式共有六种不同的构型,分为两组:(I)三角形构型,由两根平行螺钉和一根置于上方、下方、前方或后方的第三根螺钉组成;(II)线性构型,两根或三根螺钉呈垂直线排列。在我们的研究中,我们在实验室环境中使用合成骨模型测试了每种构型的相对强度。采用双向方差分析和事后检验,在5%显著性水平下进行统计分析,以检验不同构型结果之间的差异。我们的结果清楚地表明,与其他构型相比,三角形构型在失效前具有更高的峰值载荷、更高的极限载荷、更小的位移和更多的能量吸收。