• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effects of price and policy on marijuana use: what can be learned from the Australian experience?

作者信息

Williams J

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2004 Feb;13(2):123-37. doi: 10.1002/hec.796.

DOI:10.1002/hec.796
PMID:14737751
Abstract

This research examines the responsiveness of the demand for marijuana to changes in its money price and criminal status using data on individuals from the Australian National Drug Strategy's Household Surveys (NDSHS). The results suggest that both the prevalence of marijuana use and the conditional demand for marijuana in the general population are responsive to changes in its money price. Significant differences are found in the effect of price on participation in marijuana use across age-groups, with participation by youth more price sensitive than participation by older age-groups. Similarly, the effect of the legal status of marijuana use on the participation decision is found to differ across age-groups and gender. Specifically, decriminalisation is associated with an increases in the prevalence of use by males over the age of 25. There is no evidence that decriminalisation significantly increases participation in marijuana use by either young males or females, or that decriminalisation increases the frequency of use among marijuana users.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effects of price and policy on marijuana use: what can be learned from the Australian experience?
Health Econ. 2004 Feb;13(2):123-37. doi: 10.1002/hec.796.
2
Alcohol and marijuana use among college students: economic complements or substitutes?大学生中的酒精和大麻使用情况:经济互补品还是替代品?
Health Econ. 2004 Sep;13(9):825-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.859.
3
Marijuana: use among young males and health outcomes.
Am J Mens Health. 2009 Sep;3(3):265-74. doi: 10.1177/1557988309340577. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
4
Why parents worry: initiation into cannabis use by youth and their educational attainment.父母为何担忧:青少年开始使用大麻及其学业成就。
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):132-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
5
The impact of cannabis decriminalisation in Australia and the United States.澳大利亚和美国大麻合法化的影响。
J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(2):157-86.
6
Marijuana initiation among American youth and its risks as dynamic processes: prospective findings from a national longitudinal study.美国青少年开始吸食大麻及其风险的动态过程:一项全国纵向研究的前瞻性结果
Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(2):195-211. doi: 10.1080/10826080802347636.
7
Alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use patterns among youth in Canada.加拿大青少年的酒精、大麻和烟草使用模式。
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 May;19(4):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9095-4. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
8
Economic and cultural correlates of cannabis use among mid-adolescents in 31 countries.31个国家青少年中期大麻使用的经济和文化关联因素
Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):241-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01309.x.
9
Health status and labour force participation: evidence from Australia.健康状况与劳动力参与:来自澳大利亚的证据。
Health Econ. 2006 Mar;15(3):241-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.1053.
10
Use of marijuana in pharmacy students (2000-2005).药学专业学生使用大麻的情况(2000 - 2005年)
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005 Dec;149(2):477-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map.大麻合法化法律对健康、安全及社会经济的影响:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 30;19(4):e1362. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1362. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Characteristics that influence purchase choice for cannabis products: a systematic review.影响大麻产品购买选择的特征:一项系统综述。
J Cannabis Res. 2022 Feb 1;4(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00117-0.
3
Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
大麻政策的自由化是否会影响青少年和年轻人的使用水平?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e025880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880.
4
Cannabis decriminalization: A study of recent policy change in five U.S. states.大麻非刑罪化:对美国五个州近期政策变化的研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Big data on a big new market: Insights from Washington State's legal cannabis market.大数据在新兴大市场:来自华盛顿州合法大麻市场的洞察。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.031. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
6
Misreporting and econometric modelling of zeros in survey data on social bads: An application to cannabis consumption.社会不良行为调查数据中零值的错误报告与计量经济学建模:以大麻消费为例
Health Econ. 2018 Feb;27(2):372-389. doi: 10.1002/hec.3553. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
7
Early Impacts of Marijuana Legalization: An Evaluation of Prices in Colorado and Washington.大麻合法化的早期影响:对科罗拉多州和华盛顿州价格的评估
J Prim Prev. 2017 Jun;38(3):221-248. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0471-x.
8
Cannabis Liberalization and Adolescent Cannabis Use: A Cross-National Study in 38 Countries.大麻合法化与青少年大麻使用:一项在38个国家开展的跨国研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0143562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143562. eCollection 2015.
9
Why Changes in Price Matter When Thinking About Marijuana Policy: A Review of the Literature on the Elasticity of Demand.思考大麻政策时价格变化为何重要:关于需求弹性的文献综述
Public Health Rev. 2014;35(2):1-18. doi: 10.1007/BF03391701.
10
Cost benefit analysis of two policy options for cannabis: status quo and legalisation.两种大麻政策选择的成本效益分析:现状与合法化。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095569. eCollection 2014.