Suppr超能文献

刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs):危重症患者常见的脑电图现象。

Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill.

作者信息

Hirsch Lawrence J, Claassen Jan, Mayer Stephan A, Emerson Ronald G

机构信息

Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Critical Care Division, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2004 Feb;45(2):109-23. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.38103.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe an underrecognized EEG phenomenon in critically ill patients undergoing continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG). We named these EEG patterns stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs).

METHODS

We reviewed 150 consecutive patients undergoing cEEG during a 9-month period and compared those with and without SIRPIDs. SIRPIDs were defined as periodic, rhythmic, or ictal-appearing discharges that were consistently induced by alerting stimuli.

RESULTS

We identified 33 patients with SIRPIDs (22%). SIRPID patterns included periodic epileptiform discharges in 21 patients (nine lateralized) and rhythmic patterns with evolution that fulfilled criteria for ictal discharges in 18 patients (12 unilateral). Eight patients had prior epilepsy; 24 had acute brain injury. Half the patients (17 of 33) had seizures, clinical or subclinical, during the acute illness in addition to SIRPIDs, and half (16 of 33) did not. No significant difference was found in the incidence of clinical seizures in patients with SIRPIDs (30%) compared with those without (45%). Clinical status epilepticus was more common in patients with focal (43%) or ictal-appearing (33%) SIRPIDs than in those without SIRPIDs (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rhythmic, periodic, or ictal-appearing EEG patterns are commonly elicited by stimulation in critically ill, encephalopathic patients. Recording video, documenting patient stimulation, or repetitively examining patients during cEEG is necessary to recognize these patterns and to differentiate SIRPIDs from spontaneous seizures. Further research is necessary to determine the pathophysiologic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance of SIRPIDs.

摘要

目的

描述在接受连续脑电图监测(cEEG)的重症患者中一种未被充分认识的脑电图现象。我们将这些脑电图模式命名为刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs)。

方法

我们回顾了在9个月期间连续接受cEEG监测的150例患者,并比较了有和没有SIRPIDs的患者。SIRPIDs被定义为由警觉刺激持续诱发的周期性、节律性或发作样放电。

结果

我们识别出33例有SIRPIDs的患者(22%)。SIRPID模式包括21例患者的周期性癫痫样放电(9例为单侧性)以及18例患者(12例为单侧性)具有演变过程且符合发作性放电标准的节律性模式。8例患者既往有癫痫病史;24例有急性脑损伤。一半的患者(33例中的17例)在急性疾病期间除了SIRPIDs外还出现了临床或亚临床癫痫发作,另一半(33例中的16例)则没有。有SIRPIDs的患者临床癫痫发作的发生率(30%)与没有SIRPIDs的患者(45%)相比,未发现显著差异。临床癫痫持续状态在有局灶性(43%)或发作样(33%)SIRPIDs的患者中比没有SIRPIDs的患者(17%)更常见。

结论

在重症、脑病患者中,节律性、周期性或发作样脑电图模式通常由刺激诱发。在cEEG期间记录视频、记录患者受到的刺激或反复检查患者对于识别这些模式以及区分SIRPIDs与自发性癫痫发作是必要的。需要进一步研究以确定SIRPIDs的病理生理、预后和治疗意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验