• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或痫性放电的相关因素及其预后意义。

Associated Factors and Prognostic Implications of Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2016 May 1;73(5):585-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0006.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0006
PMID:26975002
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The implications of stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) sometimes found on prolonged electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings are uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of SIRPIDs and their clinical implications in critically ill patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, international retrospective study was performed from October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2014, of consecutive adult patients hospitalized in intensive care units with alteration of consciousness who underwent EEG recordings at 3 separate centers. Demographic data, including admission diagnosis, age, sex, history of epilepsy, and EEG findings, were noted. Characteristics of SIRPIDs were documented. Data were evaluated for predictors of SIRPIDs and in-hospital mortality. Data analysis was performed from January 16, 2015, to June 15, 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence of SIRPIDs, association of SIRPIDs with mortality and other EEG characteristics, and EEG and clinical predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 416 patients were studied. The median age of patients was 60 years (interquartile range, 46-71 years), and 252 (60.6%) were male. A total of 104 patients (25.0%) did not survive to hospital discharge. SIRPIDs were identified in 43 patients (10.3%). The proportion of patients with SIRPIDs was not significantly different across the 3 sites (P = .34). Anoxic brain injury (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 1.73-8.33; P < .001), the use of antiepileptic medications (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.31-8.00; P = .01), electrographic seizures (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.13-7.19; P = .03), generalized periodic discharges with triphasic morphologic features (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.67-8.02; P = .001), and sporadic sharp waves and periodic discharges (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.13-5.92; P = .02) were independently associated with the presence of SIRPIDs. Older age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P = .005), anoxic brain injury (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.96-6.21; P ≤ .001), and absence of EEG reactivity (OR, 8.14; 95% CI, 4.20-15.79; P < .001) but not SIRPIDs (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.79-3.78; P = .17) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In critically ill patients undergoing EEG recordings, SIRPIDs occurred in 43 (10.3%) and were associated with other electrographic abnormalities previously reported to indicate poor prognosis. However, SIRPIDs were not independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

摘要

重要性

在长时间脑电图(EEG)记录中有时会发现刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或癫痫发作性放电(SIRPIDs),但其影响尚不确定。

目的

评估危重病患者中 SIRPIDs 的发生率及其临床意义。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、国际回顾性研究,于 2012 年 10 月 1 日至 2014 年 9 月 30 日在 3 个不同中心对意识改变的重症监护病房住院的成年患者进行连续研究。记录了人口统计学数据,包括入院诊断、年龄、性别、癫痫病史和脑电图发现。记录了 SIRPIDs 的特征。评估了 SIRPIDs 与院内死亡率的预测因素。数据分析于 2015 年 1 月 16 日至 2015 年 6 月 15 日进行。

主要结果和措施

SIRPIDs 的发生率、SIRPIDs 与死亡率和其他 EEG 特征的关系,以及 EEG 和临床预测死亡率的因素。

结果

共纳入 416 例患者。患者的中位年龄为 60 岁(四分位距,46-71 岁),252 例(60.6%)为男性。共有 104 例(25.0%)患者未存活至出院。43 例(10.3%)患者发现 SIRPIDs。SIRPIDs 患者在 3 个地点的比例无显著差异(P = .34)。缺氧性脑损伤(比值比[OR],3.80;95%置信区间[CI],1.73-8.33;P < .001)、使用抗癫痫药物(OR,3.24;95% CI,1.31-8.00;P = .01)、电癫痫发作(OR,2.85;95% CI,1.13-7.19;P = .03)、具有三相形态特征的广泛周期性放电(OR,3.66;95% CI,1.67-8.02;P = .001)和散发性尖波和周期性放电(OR,2.59;95% CI,1.13-5.92;P = .02)与 SIRPIDs 的存在独立相关。年龄较大(OR,1.02;95% CI,1.01-1.04;P = .005)、缺氧性脑损伤(OR,3.49;95% CI,1.96-6.21;P ≤ .001)和 EEG 无反应性(OR,8.14;95% CI,4.20-15.79;P < .001)但不是 SIRPIDs(OR,1.73;95% CI,0.79-3.78;P = .17)与院内死亡率独立相关。

结论和相关性

在接受 EEG 记录的危重病患者中,SIRPIDs 的发生率为 43 例(10.3%),与先前报道的表明预后不良的其他电异常相关。然而,SIRPIDs 与院内死亡率无独立相关性。

相似文献

1
Associated Factors and Prognostic Implications of Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges.刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或痫性放电的相关因素及其预后意义。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 May 1;73(5):585-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0006.
2
Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill.刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs):危重症患者常见的脑电图现象。
Epilepsia. 2004 Feb;45(2):109-23. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.38103.x.
3
SIRPIDs: prevalence and outcome in critically ill patients.信号调节蛋白δ:危重症患者中的患病率及预后
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Oct;31(5):418-21. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000094.
4
Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): an intriguing EEG phenomenon.刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs):一种有趣的脑电图现象。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2013 Dec;71(12):931-6. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130201.
5
Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs).刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作期放电(SIRPIDs)
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 May;35(3):229-233. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000434.
6
Similarity of lateralized rhythmic delta activity to periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges in critically ill patients.危重病患者中偏向性节律性德尔塔活动与周期性偏向性癫痫样放电的相似性。
JAMA Neurol. 2013 Oct;70(10):1288-95. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3475.
7
Implications of stimulus-induced, rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) in hospitalized patients.住院患者中刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作期放电(SIRPIDs)的意义
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 23;13:1062330. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1062330. eCollection 2022.
8
Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic or Periodic Intermittent Discharges (SIRPIDs) in patients with triphasic waves and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.具有三相波和克雅氏病的患者中的刺激诱导的节律性或周期性间歇性放电(SIRPIDs)。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Aug;132(8):1757-1769. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 20.
9
Termination patterns of stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal patterns and spontaneous electrographic seizures.刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作期模式以及自发性脑电图发作的终止模式。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2279-2285. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后刺激诱发的脑电图模式与预后
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Jul 21;6:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.001. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Triphasic waves: To treat or not to treat?三相波:治疗还是不治疗?
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2025 Jun 27;10:265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.06.001. eCollection 2025.
2
Implications of stimulus-induced, rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) in hospitalized patients.住院患者中刺激诱发的节律性、周期性或发作期放电(SIRPIDs)的意义
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 23;13:1062330. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1062330. eCollection 2022.
3
Adult Critical Care Electroencephalography Monitoring for Seizures: A Narrative Review.成人癫痫发作的重症监护脑电图监测:一项叙述性综述。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 15;13:951286. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.951286. eCollection 2022.
4
Stimulus Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) and its Association with Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Critically Ill Patients.刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs)及其与危重症患者非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的关系。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2023 May;54(3):247-254. doi: 10.1177/15500594221095434. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后刺激诱发的脑电图模式与预后
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Jul 21;6:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.001. eCollection 2021.
6
A 73-Year-Old Woman with Respiratory Failure and Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) in the Absence of a Detectable Brain Insult Diagnosed and Monitored by Continuous Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Treated with Valproate, Carbamazepine, and Clonazepam.一位 73 岁女性,因呼吸衰竭以及在无明显脑损伤的情况下出现刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或癫痫样放电(SIRPIDs),经连续脑电图(EEG)诊断和监测,并接受丙戊酸钠、卡马西平和氯硝西泮治疗。
Am J Case Rep. 2021 Mar 30;22:e930414. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.930414.
7
Quantitative EEG reactivity and machine learning for prognostication in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.定量脑电图反应与机器学习在缺氧缺血性脑损伤中的预后评估。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct;130(10):1908-1916. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
EEG Reactivity Evaluation Practices for Adult and Pediatric Hypoxic-Ischemic Coma Prognostication in North America.北美成人及儿童缺氧缺血性昏迷预后评估中的脑电图反应性评估实践
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov;35(6):510-514. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000517.
9
Population of the ictal-interictal zone: The significance of periodic and rhythmic activity.发作期-发作间期区域的细胞群:周期性和节律性活动的意义
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2017 May 26;2:107-118. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2017.05.001. eCollection 2017.
10
Clinical neurophysiology for neurological prognostication of comatose patients after cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后昏迷患者神经预后评估的临床神经生理学
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2017 Mar 20;2:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2017.03.001. eCollection 2017.