Di Napoli Anteo, Di Lallo Domenico, Perucci Carlo A, Schifano Patrizia, Orzalesi Marcello, Franco Francesco, De Carolis Maria Pia
Agency for Public Health Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;18(1):80-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2003.00517.x.
Radiological examination of the abdomen is critical to the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Previous studies on the reproducibility of radiological findings have been limited in size and based only on infants with the disease. We conducted a study among a sample of high-risk infants with and without the diagnosis of NEC: (1) to measure the degree of inter-observer agreement of NEC radiological diagnosis and signs and (2) identify a profile of radiological signs which led the observers to make a diagnosis of NEC. We collected 297 X-rays from a sample of 57 newborns admitted in 1999 to neonatal intensive care and neonatal surgery units in Rome, Italy. Three specialists in paediatric radiology examined the films independently and without any clinical information about patients. The analyses were conducted on a total of 891 forms filled in by the observers. Kappa values were calculated to measure the inter-observer reliability. To identify the profiles of radiological signs, a multidimensional analysis, binary segmentation, was carried out. The reproducibility of radiographic signs was 0.55 (P < 0.01) for diffuse gaseous intestinal distention, 0.22 (P < 0.01) for bowel wall thickening, 0.10 (P < 0.01) for presence of portal venous gas and 0.29 (P < 0.01) for pneumatosis intestinalis. The agreement for radiographic diagnosis suspected/confirmed of NEC was 0.31 (P < 0.01). Among the 23 possible combinations of radiographic signs, the three radiologists indicated four profiles that produced a diagnosis of NEC containing, respectively, two, three, four and five signs. Our study found, in a large sample of radiographs selected from a population of infants with and without NEC, a poor reliability for NEC diagnosis and individual radiological signs among three expert radiologists. Clinical information and the presence of more than one radiological sign can reduce the margin of observer's error that inevitably exists when dealing with a diagnosis as difficult as NEC.
腹部的放射学检查对于坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的诊断至关重要。先前关于放射学检查结果可重复性的研究规模有限,且仅基于患有该疾病的婴儿。我们在一组有或无NEC诊断的高危婴儿样本中开展了一项研究:(1)测量NEC放射学诊断及体征的观察者间一致性程度;(2)确定能使观察者做出NEC诊断的放射学体征特征。我们从1999年入住意大利罗马新生儿重症监护病房和新生儿外科病房的57名新生儿样本中收集了297份X光片。三名儿科放射学专家独立检查这些片子,且不了解任何关于患者的临床信息。分析是基于观察者填写的总共891份表格进行的。计算卡帕值以测量观察者间的可靠性。为了确定放射学体征特征,进行了多维度分析——二元分割。弥漫性肠道气体扩张的放射学体征可重复性为0.55(P<0.01),肠壁增厚为0.22(P<0.01),门静脉气体存在为0.10(P<0.01),肠壁积气为0.29(P<0.01)。疑似/确诊NEC的放射学诊断一致性为0.31(P<0.01)。在23种可能的放射学体征组合中,三位放射科医生指出了四种能做出NEC诊断的特征,分别包含两个、三个、四个和五个体征。我们的研究发现,在从有或无NEC的婴儿群体中选取的大量X光片样本中,三位专家放射科医生对NEC诊断及个体放射学体征的可靠性较差。临床信息以及不止一种放射学体征的存在可以减少在处理像NEC这样困难的诊断时不可避免存在的观察者误差范围。