Bouma Annemarie, Dekker Aldo, de Jong Mart C M
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Jan 14;98(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.016.
The foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in The Netherlands in 2001 most likely started on a mixed veal-calf/dairy-goat farm. The outbreak among the 74 calves on this farm appeared to be limited to four animals, and no clinical signs of FMD were reported. Also on a second veal-calf farm minor clinical signs and limited virus transmission were observed. Since FMD is known to be a very contagious disease, and can cause severe lesions, these observations were disputed. Therefore, we carried out two experiments to determine whether the Dutch FMD virus isolate from 2001 does spread among individually housed calves with limited contacts, either indirect (experiment 1) or direct (experiment 2). In experiment 1, four pairs of calves were housed in an individual box at 1m distance from each other. In experiment 2, two groups of three calves were housed in individual boxes, directly bordering each other. We infected one animal per pair in experiment 1, and the calf in the middle in experiment 2. We recorded clinical signs, virus shedding in saliva and the development of antibodies. In addition, we determined whether the virus was transmitted from the inoculated calves to the neighbour(s). All inoculated calves showed mild signs of FMD--fever, and some vesicles on hooves and/or in the mouth--but only one calf showed signs that were visible without physical examination. All inoculated calves shed virus in the saliva and developed neutralising antibodies. None of the contact animals seroconverted, indicating that virus transmission did not occur. These experiments showed that no virus transmission among individual housed calves can occur. This finding supports the hypothesis of the route of virus introduction to The Netherlands in 2001 and show that the observations on the two veal-calf farms were not impossible.
2001年荷兰口蹄疫疫情很可能始于一个犊牛/奶山羊混合养殖场。该养殖场74头犊牛中的疫情似乎仅限于4头动物,且未报告口蹄疫的临床症状。在另一个犊牛养殖场也观察到了轻微临床症状和有限的病毒传播情况。由于口蹄疫是一种众所周知的极具传染性的疾病,且可导致严重病变,这些观察结果受到了质疑。因此,我们进行了两项实验,以确定2001年荷兰口蹄疫病毒分离株是否能在接触有限的单独饲养的犊牛之间传播,传播方式分为间接传播(实验1)或直接传播(实验2)。在实验1中,四对犊牛被安置在彼此相距1米的单独围栏中。在实验2中,两组三头犊牛被安置在彼此直接相邻的单独围栏中。在实验1中,每对中的一头动物被感染,在实验2中,中间的那头犊牛被感染。我们记录了临床症状、唾液中的病毒排出情况以及抗体的产生情况。此外,我们确定病毒是否从接种的犊牛传播给了相邻的犊牛。所有接种的犊牛都表现出轻微的口蹄疫症状——发热,蹄部和/或口腔出现一些水疱——但只有一头犊牛出现了无需体格检查就能看到的症状。所有接种的犊牛唾液中都排出了病毒并产生了中和抗体。没有一头接触的动物发生血清转化,这表明没有发生病毒传播。这些实验表明,单独饲养的犊牛之间不会发生病毒传播。这一发现支持了2001年病毒传入荷兰的途径假说,并表明在这两个犊牛养殖场的观察结果并非不可能。