Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud: everyone in science must be active in its process.
作者信息
Lange John H
出版信息
BMJ. 2004 Jan 24;328(7433):230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230-b.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud: everyone in science must be active in its process.编辑及其对诽谤和欺诈行为的重视程度：科学界的每个人都必须积极参与科学进程。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 24;328(7433):230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230-b.
2
Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud: we need whistleblowers.编辑及其对诽谤和欺诈行为的优先处理方式：我们需要举报人。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 24;328(7433):230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230.
3
Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud: external checks must be imposed to protect the public.编辑及其对诽谤和欺诈行为的优先处理方式：必须进行外部审查以保护公众。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 24;328(7433):230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230-a.
4
What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?我们对科学界的欺诈及其他形式的学术不诚实行为了解多少？第二部分：欺诈为何发生及其影响是什么？
Curr Contents Clin Med. 1987 Apr 13;15(15):3-10.
5
Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.科研不端行为以及编辑和同行评审过程。
J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):298-309.
6
Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.生物医学研究中的欺诈行为——期刊编辑的作用。
Life Sci. 2011 Nov 21;89(21-22):755-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
7
Is scientific publishing a criminal activity?科学出版是一种犯罪活动吗？
Clin Biochem. 2006 May;39(5):473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.04.017. Epub 2006 Apr 22.
8
[Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing].[医学科研出版中的不当行为]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Sep 3;138(36):1822-6.
9
How far do you trust your colleagues?你有多信任你的同事？
New Sci. 1987 Jan 15;113(1543):59.
10
Editors' responsibility in defeating fraud.编辑在打击欺诈行为中的责任。
Nature. 1999 May 6;399(6731):13. doi: 10.1038/19837.
Zotero 插件