Abouleish Amr E, Dexter Franklin, Whitten Charles W, Zavaleta Jeffery R, Prough Donald S
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, Texas 77555-0591, USA.
Anesthesiology. 2004 Feb;100(2):403-12. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00033.
Anesthesiology departments incur staffing costs that are not covered by revenue because the operating room (OR) time allocation and case scheduling are not done to maximize OR efficiency and because surgical durations are longer than average. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate a method to quantify net anesthesia staffing costs due to longer-than-average surgical durations and evaluate the factors that influence staffing costs.
Data collected from two anesthesiology departments in academic hospitals for 1 yr included date of surgery, time that patients entered the OR, time that patients exited the OR, surgical service, and the Current Procedural Terminology code for the primary surgical procedure. Anesthesia care performed outside the main surgical suite and services not billed with American Society of Anesthesiologists units were excluded. National average surgical durations were determined from the Current Procedural Terminology code from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' database. Actual surgical durations were then used to determine staffing solutions to maximize OR efficiency; national average surgical durations were then used to determine a second solution. The difference in staffing costs between these two staffing solutions represented the staffing costs attributable to longer surgical durations. Costs were converted to dollar amounts using compensation values reported in a national compensation survey. The differences in revenue were determined by applying conversion factors to the differences in surgical durations. The annual net cost attributable to longer surgical durations equaled the staffing costs minus the revenue produced by longer durations. Net staffing costs were estimated for two hospitals using median staffing compensation and median payer mix. Net staffing costs were then recalculated by varying the parameters (conversion factors, limits on differences between actual and average surgical duration, levels of compensation, surgical service size of OR allocation).
Using the median compensation of staff and an average conversion factor, the net annual staffing costs attributable to longer surgical durations were $672,100 for the first hospital. However, if staff members were highly compensated and the payer mix was unfavorable, the net staffing costs were $1,688,000. Reducing the difference between actual and average duration resulted in lower staffing costs. Net staffing costs were less in a second hospital studied that had many low-volume surgical services.
Longer-than-average surgical durations can increase net staffing costs for anesthesiology groups. The increase is dependent on factors such as staffing compensation and payer mix.
麻醉科产生的人员配置成本无法通过收入来覆盖,原因在于手术室(OR)的时间分配和病例安排未能实现手术室效率最大化,且手术时长超过平均水平。本文的目的是展示一种方法,用以量化因手术时长超过平均水平而产生的净麻醉人员配置成本,并评估影响人员配置成本的因素。
从学术医院的两个麻醉科收集的1年数据包括手术日期、患者进入手术室的时间、患者离开手术室的时间、手术科室以及主要外科手术的现行手术操作术语代码。排除在主手术套房外提供的麻醉护理以及未按美国麻醉医师协会单位计费的服务。根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心数据库中的现行手术操作术语代码确定全国平均手术时长。然后使用实际手术时长来确定人员配置方案以实现手术室效率最大化;接着使用全国平均手术时长来确定第二种方案。这两种人员配置方案之间的人员配置成本差异代表了因手术时长较长而产生的人员配置成本。使用全国薪酬调查中报告的薪酬价值将成本换算为美元金额。通过将换算系数应用于手术时长差异来确定收入差异。因手术时长较长而产生的年度净成本等于人员配置成本减去较长时长产生的收入。使用中位数人员配置薪酬和中位数付款人组合估算两家医院的净人员配置成本。然后通过改变参数(换算系数、实际与平均手术时长差异的限制、薪酬水平、手术室分配的手术科室规模)重新计算净人员配置成本。
使用员工的中位数薪酬和平均换算系数,第一家医院因手术时长较长而产生的年度净人员配置成本为672,100美元。然而,如果员工薪酬较高且付款人组合不利,净人员配置成本则为1,688,000美元。缩小实际与平均时长之间的差异会导致人员配置成本降低。在研究的第二家拥有许多低手术量科室的医院中,净人员配置成本较低。
手术时长超过平均水平会增加麻醉科的净人员配置成本。这种增加取决于人员配置薪酬和付款人组合等因素。