Suppr超能文献

麻醉团队因手术室未得到合理分配以及病例未得到合理安排以实现手术室效率最大化而产生的劳动力成本。

Labor costs incurred by anesthesiology groups because of operating rooms not being allocated and cases not being scheduled to maximize operating room efficiency.

作者信息

Abouleish Amr E, Dexter Franklin, Epstein Richard H, Lubarsky David A, Whitten Charles W, Prough Donald S

机构信息

*Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; †Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; ‡Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; §Medical Data Applications, Ltd., Jenkintown, Pennsylvania; ∥Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and ¶Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2003 Apr;96(4):1109-1113. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000052710.82077.43.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Determination of operating room (OR) block allocation and case scheduling is often not based on maximizing OR efficiency, but rather on tradition and surgeon convenience. As a result, anesthesiology groups often incur additional labor costs. When negotiating financial support, heads of anesthesiology departments are often challenged to justify the subsidy necessary to offset these additional labor costs. In this study, we describe a method for calculating a statistically sound estimate of the excess labor costs incurred by an anesthesiology group because of inefficient OR allocation and case scheduling. OR information system and anesthesia staffing data for 1 yr were obtained from two university hospitals. Optimal OR allocation for each surgical service was determined by maximizing the efficiency of use of the OR staff. Hourly costs were converted to dollar amounts by using the nationwide median compensation for academic and private-practice anesthesia providers. Differences between actual costs and the optimal OR allocation were determined. For Hospital A, estimated annual excess labor costs were $1.6 million (95% confidence interval, $1.5-$1.7 million) and $2.0 million ($1.89-$2.05 million) when academic and private-practice compensation, respectively, was calculated. For Hospital B, excess labor costs were $1.0 million ($1.08-$1.17 million) and $1.4 million ($1.32-1.43 million) for academic and private-practice compensation, respectively. This study demonstrates a methodology for an anesthesiology group to estimate its excess labor costs. The group can then use these estimates when negotiating for subsidies with its hospital, medical school, or multispecialty medical group.

IMPLICATIONS

We describe a new application for a previously reported statistical method to calculate operating room (OR) allocations to maximize OR efficiency. When optimal OR allocations and case scheduling are not implemented, the resulting increase in labor costs can be used in negotiations as a statistically sound estimate for the increased labor cost to the anesthesiology department.

摘要

未标注

手术室(OR)的区域分配和病例安排通常并非基于使手术室效率最大化,而是基于传统和外科医生的便利性。结果,麻醉科往往会产生额外的劳动力成本。在协商财政支持时,麻醉科主任常常面临为抵消这些额外劳动力成本所需补贴进行辩护的挑战。在本研究中,我们描述了一种方法,用于统计合理地估算麻醉科因手术室分配和病例安排效率低下而产生的额外劳动力成本。从两家大学医院获取了1年的手术室信息系统和麻醉人员配置数据。通过最大化手术室工作人员的使用效率来确定每个外科服务的最佳手术室分配。使用全国范围内学术和私人执业麻醉提供者的中位数薪酬将每小时成本换算为美元金额。确定实际成本与最佳手术室分配之间的差异。对于医院A,分别计算学术和私人执业薪酬时,估计年度额外劳动力成本分别为160万美元(95%置信区间,150万 - 170万美元)和200万美元(189万 - 205万美元)。对于医院B,学术和私人执业薪酬的额外劳动力成本分别为100万美元(108万 - 117万美元)和140万美元(132万 - 143万美元)。本研究展示了一种麻醉科估算其额外劳动力成本的方法。然后,该科室在与医院、医学院或多专科医疗集团协商补贴时可以使用这些估算值。

启示

我们描述了一种先前报道的统计方法的新应用,用于计算手术室(OR)分配以最大化手术室效率。当未实施最佳手术室分配和病例安排时,由此产生的劳动力成本增加可在谈判中作为麻醉科劳动力成本增加的统计合理估算值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验