Mannucci E, Ognibene A, Sposato I, Brogi M, Gallori G, Bardini G, Cremasco F, Messeri G, Rotella C M
Section of Metabolic Diseases and Diabetology, Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Pathophysiology, University of Florence Medical School, Viale Pieraccini 6, I-50134 Florence, Italy.
Acta Diabetol. 2003 Dec;40(4):181-6. doi: 10.1007/s00592-003-0109-8.
The use of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) only has been proposed for the screening and diagnosis of diabetes, but its sensitivity has been reported to be unsatisfactory. The use of HbA1C, alone or combined with FPG, has been suggested for the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). In a sample of 1215 adult subjects without previously known diabetes, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of FPG and HbA1C in diagnosing diabetes and IGT, determined by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). All lean diabetic patients, and 85% of overweight and obese diabetic individuals, had FPG > or =7 mmol/l. FPG >6.1 mmol/l had a sensitivity of 98.8% and a specificity of 32.9%; HbA1C had a lower specificity and sensitivity for the screening of diabetes. A screening strategy for diabetes based on FPG, with OGTT in all overweight subjects with FPG >6.1 mmol/l, is suggested. Neither FPG nor HbA1C is effective in the screening of IGT; although combined FPG and HbA1C could be useful for case finding, screening for IGT with OGTT is advisable in all subjects at high risk.
仅使用空腹血糖(FPG)已被提议用于糖尿病的筛查和诊断,但其敏感性据报道并不理想。有人建议单独使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)或联合FPG用于糖尿病和糖耐量受损(IGT)的筛查。在1215名既往无糖尿病的成年受试者样本中,我们评估了FPG和HbA1C在诊断糖尿病和IGT方面的敏感性和特异性,诊断由口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)确定。所有体型偏瘦的糖尿病患者以及85%的超重和肥胖糖尿病患者,空腹血糖均≥7 mmol/L。空腹血糖>6.1 mmol/L时,敏感性为98.8%,特异性为32.9%;糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病筛查方面的特异性和敏感性较低。建议采用基于空腹血糖的糖尿病筛查策略,对所有空腹血糖>6.1 mmol/L的超重受试者进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验。空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白在糖耐量受损的筛查中均无效;尽管空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白联合使用可能有助于病例发现,但对所有高危人群而言,采用口服葡萄糖耐量试验筛查糖耐量受损是可取的。