Davis George A, Rudy Anita C, Archer Sanford M, Wermeling Daniel P, McNamara Patrick J
Division of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536-0293, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jan;24(1):26-32. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.1.26.34810.
To investigate the effect of the nasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of single-dose intranasal hydromorphone hydrochloride in patients with allergic rhinitis.
Randomized, three-way, crossover pharmacokinetic study.
University clinical research unit.
Twelve patients with allergic rhinitis.
Hydromorphone hydrochloride 2.0 mg was administered by intravenous infusion (treatment A), intranasal spray without allergic rhinitis treatment (treatment B), and intranasal spray after 6 days of fluticasone propionate (treatment C). Blood samples were collected serially from 0-16 hours.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used for statistical analysis. Mean (% coefficient of variation) absolute bioavailability of intranasal hydromorphone was 51.9% (28.2) and 46.9% (30.3) in patients with allergic rhinitis with and without treatment with fluticasone propionate, respectively. Mean maximum concentration (Cmax) values were 3.02 and 3.56 ng/ml, respectively. No statistical differences in Cmax and area under the concentration versus time curve were detected between intranasal treatments. Bioavailability values for both intranasal treatments were lower than those in healthy volunteers (57%). Median time to Cmax (Tmax) values were significantly different (p=0.02) for treatments B and C (15 and 30 min, respectively) using rank-transformed Tmax for ANOVA. Adverse effects were consistent with known effects of hydromorphone administered by other routes, with the exception of bad taste after intranasal administration.
Hydromorphone was rapidly absorbed after nasal administration, with maximum concentrations occurring for most subjects within 30 minutes. Allergic rhinitis may affect pain management strategies for intranasal hydromorphone, with a delay in onset of action for patients treated with fluticasone propionate.
探讨鼻用皮质类固醇丙酸氟替卡松对变应性鼻炎患者单剂量鼻内给予盐酸氢吗啡酮生物利用度和药代动力学的影响。
随机、三交叉药代动力学研究。
大学临床研究单位。
12例变应性鼻炎患者。
静脉输注给予盐酸氢吗啡酮2.0mg(治疗A)、未进行变应性鼻炎治疗的鼻喷雾剂(治疗B)以及丙酸氟替卡松治疗6天后的鼻喷雾剂(治疗C)。在0至16小时内连续采集血样。
采用非房室方法确定药代动力学参数。使用方差分析(ANOVA)模型进行统计分析。变应性鼻炎患者中,使用和未使用丙酸氟替卡松治疗时,鼻内给予氢吗啡酮后的平均(%变异系数)绝对生物利用度分别为51.9%(28.2)和46.9%(30.3)。平均最大浓度(Cmax)值分别为3.02和3.56ng/ml。鼻内治疗之间未检测到Cmax和浓度-时间曲线下面积的统计学差异。两种鼻内治疗的生物利用度值均低于健康志愿者(57%)。使用秩转换Tmax进行ANOVA分析时,治疗B和C的Cmax中位时间(Tmax)值有显著差异(p = 0.02)(分别为15和30分钟)。不良反应与其他给药途径给予氢吗啡酮的已知作用一致,但鼻内给药后有口苦现象。
氢吗啡酮鼻内给药后吸收迅速,大多数受试者在30分钟内达到最大浓度。变应性鼻炎可能影响鼻内给予氢吗啡酮的疼痛管理策略,使用丙酸氟替卡松治疗的患者起效延迟。