Howland W C
Healthquest Research, Austin, Texas 78759, USA.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1996 May;26 Suppl 3:18-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb00654.x.
Intranasal corticosteroids have been shown to be more effective than oral antihistamines for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, there are some who question whether intranasally administered corticosteroids should be used due to potential systemic effects. Fluticasone propionate, a potent corticosteroid with high specificity for the glucocorticoid receptor, is available as an aqueous nasal spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. To determine whether the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) was due to direct topical effects on the nasal mucosa or to indirect systemic effects following absorption from the nasal mucosa or from the swallowed portion of an intranasal dose, FPANS 200 micrograms once daily was compared with oral fluticasone propionate 5 mg or 10 mg once daily or placebo for 2 weeks in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. These oral dosages were chosen to yield low but consistent plasma fluticasone propionate concentrations. Both clinician- and patient-rated scores for nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, and nasal itching were significantly lower in the intranasal fluticasone propionate group compared with both oral fluticasone propionate groups. A separate placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with perennial rhinitis to determine if administration of FPANS 200 micrograms once daily for 1 year was associated with adverse systemic effects. At the 1-year assessment, there were no significant effects on bone mineral density or on biochemical markers of bone turnover. Similarly, there was no evidence of posterior subcapsular cataracts nor of glaucoma. Furthermore, there were no significant effects on hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis function as assessed by plasma cortisol and 24-h urinary cortisol response to the 6-h cosyntropin stimulation test. These data confirm that the efficacy of FPANS for the treatment of allergic rhinitis results from direct topical effects, thus reducing the likelihood of adverse systemic effects.
鼻内用皮质类固醇已被证明在治疗季节性变应性鼻炎方面比口服抗组胺药更有效。然而,有些人质疑由于潜在的全身效应是否应使用鼻内给药的皮质类固醇。丙酸氟替卡松是一种对糖皮质激素受体具有高特异性的强效皮质类固醇,有水性鼻喷雾剂可用于治疗变应性鼻炎。为了确定丙酸氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂(FPANS)的疗效是由于对鼻黏膜的直接局部作用,还是由于从鼻黏膜或鼻内剂量的吞咽部分吸收后的间接全身作用,在季节性变应性鼻炎患者中,将每日一次200微克的FPANS与每日一次5毫克或10毫克的口服丙酸氟替卡松或安慰剂进行了2周的比较。选择这些口服剂量以产生低但一致的血浆丙酸氟替卡松浓度。与两个口服丙酸氟替卡松组相比,鼻内丙酸氟替卡松组的临床医生和患者评定的鼻塞、流涕、打喷嚏和鼻痒评分均显著更低。在常年性鼻炎患者中进行了一项单独的安慰剂对照研究,以确定每日一次给予200微克FPANS持续1年是否与不良全身效应相关。在1年评估时,对骨矿物质密度或骨转换的生化标志物没有显著影响。同样,没有后囊下白内障或青光眼的证据。此外,通过血浆皮质醇和24小时尿皮质醇对6小时促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验的反应评估,对下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能没有显著影响。这些数据证实,FPANS治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效源于直接局部作用,从而降低了不良全身效应的可能性。