• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[为帮助患者出具的医疗证明]

[Medical certificates issued to help the patient].

作者信息

Gulbrandsen Pål, Aasland Olaf Gjerløw, Førde Reidun

机构信息

HELTEF-Stiftelse for helsetjenesteforskning, Postboks 55, 1474 Nordbyhagen.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Jan 22;124(2):192-4.

PMID:14743236
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical certificates form the basis for important decisions in society, e.g. the issuing of a driver's licence or the granting of a disability pension. We wanted to know how often doctors deliberately write favourable certificates as seen from the patient's point of view, and why doctors do so.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Questionnaire survey to a representative sample of 1605 Norwegian doctors. Doctors who answered yes to the question above gave information about the frequency of such writing of various types of certificates and their reasons for doing so.

RESULTS

1175 (73%) doctors responded. 39% confirmed deliberately writing in favour of their patients. For most types of certificates, a frequency of less than once a year was most common. 55% admitted writing favourably in disability pension certificates more than once a year, 69% so in referrals. The most common reasons given were securing just treatment and quick access to treatment. Many doctors emphasised that by answering yes, they meant that they were indeed writing expert judgments based on correct facts.

INTERPRETATION

Medical certificates deliberately written in favour of the patient is not uncommon. This should lead to a critical discussion of the need for such certificates and medical diagnoses as a basis for resource allocation, rather than the tightening of control over the practice of doctors.

摘要

背景

医疗证明是社会重要决策的依据,例如发放驾驶执照或给予残疾抚恤金。我们想了解从患者角度看,医生故意开具有利证明的频率有多高,以及医生为何这样做。

材料与方法

对1605名挪威医生的代表性样本进行问卷调查。对上述问题回答“是”的医生提供了开具各类证明的频率及原因的相关信息。

结果

1175名(73%)医生做出回应。39%的医生确认会故意为患者开具有利证明。对于大多数类型的证明,每年开具次数少于一次最为常见。55%的医生承认每年为残疾抚恤金证明开具有利证明超过一次,69%的医生在转诊证明方面如此。给出的最常见原因是确保公正治疗和快速获得治疗。许多医生强调,回答“是”意味着他们确实是基于正确事实撰写专业判断。

解读

故意为患者开具有利的医疗证明并不罕见。这应该引发对这类证明以及作为资源分配基础的医学诊断的必要性进行批判性讨论,而不是加强对医生执业的管控。

相似文献

1
[Medical certificates issued to help the patient].[为帮助患者出具的医疗证明]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Jan 22;124(2):192-4.
2
[Medical certificates issued to help the patient].[为帮助患者开具的医疗证明]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Apr 1;124(7):984; author reply 984-5.
3
[Assessment by consulting physicians and general practitioners about complex disability pension matters].[会诊医生和全科医生对复杂残疾抚恤金事宜的评估]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 May 30;115(14):1748-53.
4
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
5
[Restrictions in connection with disability pensions--physicians' view on the revised legislation].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 30;113(17):2133-6.
6
[Are physicians' examinations required for driving licences correct?].[驾驶执照所需的医师检查是否正确?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 Nov 20;120(28):3409-11.
7
[What does it feel like for a physician to be a gatekeeper?].[医生成为把关人是什么感觉?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Aug 20;122(19):1874-9.
8
[Medical judgment and legal security. Physicians as gatekeepers in the distribution of public goods].[医学判断与法律保障。医生作为公共资源分配的把关人]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Jun 10;119(15):2192-6.
9
Sickness certificates as a basis for decisions regarding entitlement to sickness insurance benefits.疾病证明作为决定是否有权享受疾病保险福利的依据。
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(4):314-20. doi: 10.1080/14034940510005798.
10
[How are the medical certificates?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Oct 16;132(19):2148-9. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0903.

引用本文的文献

1
Unsanctioned techniques for having sickness certificates accepted: a qualitative exploration and description of the strategies used by Swedish general practitioners.使病假证明被接受的未经批准的技巧:对瑞典全科医生所采用策略的定性探索与描述
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1569426. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
'Working is out of the question': a qualitative text analysis of medical certificates of disability.“工作绝无可能”:残疾医学证明的定性文本分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 20;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0627-z.
3
Views on sick-listing practice among Swedish General Practitioners--a phenomenographic study.
瑞典全科医生对病假证明开具做法的看法——一项现象学研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jul 30;8:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-44.
4
General practitioners' relationship to sickness certification.全科医生与病假证明的关系。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Mar;25(1):20-6. doi: 10.1080/02813430600879680.