Schlosser R W, Belfiore P J, Nigam R, Blischak D, Hetzroni O
Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Winter;28(4):537-49. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-537.
The effects of auditory stimuli in the form of synthetic speech output on the learning of graphic symbols were evaluated. Three adults with severe to profound mental retardation and communication impairments were taught to point to lexigrams when presented with words under two conditions. In the first condition, participants used a voice output communication aid to receive synthetic speech as antecedent and consequent stimuli. In the second condition, with a nonelectronic communications board, participants did not receive synthetic speech. A parallel treatments design was used to evaluate the effects of the synthetic speech output as an added component of the augmentative and alternative communication system. The 3 participants reached criterion when not provided with the auditory stimuli. Although 2 participants also reached criterion when not provided with the auditory stimuli, the addition of auditory stimuli resulted in more efficient learning and a decreased error rate. Maintenance results, however, indicated no differences between conditions. Finding suggest that auditory stimuli in the form of synthetic speech contribute to the efficient acquisition of graphic communication symbols.
评估了合成语音输出形式的听觉刺激对图形符号学习的影响。三名重度至极重度智力障碍和沟通障碍的成年人在两种条件下,当呈现单词时被教导指向图形文字。在第一种条件下,参与者使用语音输出沟通辅助设备接收合成语音作为先行和后续刺激。在第二种条件下,使用非电子通信板,参与者不接收合成语音。采用平行治疗设计来评估合成语音输出作为辅助和替代沟通系统附加组件的效果。3名参与者在未提供听觉刺激时达到了标准。虽然2名参与者在未提供听觉刺激时也达到了标准,但添加听觉刺激导致学习效率更高且错误率降低。然而,维持结果表明两种条件之间没有差异。研究结果表明,合成语音形式的听觉刺激有助于高效获取图形沟通符号。