行为分析中自变量的完整性。
The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis.
作者信息
Peterson L, Homer A L, Wonderlich S A
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):477-92. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477.
Abstract
Establishing a functional relationship between the independent and the dependent variable is the primary focus of applied behavior analysis. Accurate and reliable description and observation of both the independent and dependent variables are necessary to achieve this goal. Although considerable attention has been focused on ensuring the integrity of the dependent variable in the operant literature, similar effort has not been directed at ensuring the integrity of the independent variable. Inaccurate descriptions of the application of the independent variable may threaten the reliability and validity of operant research data. A survey of articles in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis demonstrated that the majority of articles published do not use any assessment of the actual occurrence of the independent variable and a sizable minority do not provide operational definitions of the independent variable. The feasibility and utility of ensuring the integrity of the independent variable is described.
摘要
建立自变量与因变量之间的函数关系是应用行为分析的主要重点。为实现这一目标，准确可靠地描述和观察自变量与因变量都是必要的。尽管在操作行为学文献中，人们相当关注确保因变量的完整性，但在确保自变量的完整性方面却没有投入类似的努力。对自变量应用的不准确描述可能会威胁到操作行为研究数据的可靠性和有效性。一项对《应用行为分析杂志》上文章的调查表明，大多数发表的文章没有对自变量的实际发生情况进行任何评估，相当一部分少数文章也没有提供自变量的操作定义。本文描述了确保自变量完整性的可行性和实用性。
相似文献
1
The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis.行为分析中自变量的完整性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):477-92. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477.
2
Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children.针对儿童的应用行为分析中的治疗完整性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):257-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-257.
3
Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the journal of applied behavior analysis 1991-2005.1991 - 2005年《应用行为分析杂志》中针对儿童的校本干预措施的治疗完整性
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):659-72. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.659-672.
4
Effects of treatment integrity failures during differential reinforcement of alternative behavior: a translational model.差异增强替代行为治疗中治疗完整性失败的影响：一个转化模型。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Mar;43(1):47-70. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-47.
5
A comparison of differential reinforcement procedures with children with autism.针对自闭症儿童的差别强化程序比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Dec;48(4):918-23. doi: 10.1002/jaba.232. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
6
The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory.可变间隔强化对学业参与度的影响：匹配理论的实证
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;25(1):143-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-143.
7
Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.固定时间强化程序对问题行为复发的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Fall;47(3):455-69. doi: 10.1002/jaba.134. Epub 2014 May 21.
8
An experimental analysis of aggression.攻击行为的实验分析。
Behav Modif. 2001 Apr;25(2):189-213. doi: 10.1177/0145445501252002.
9
On the applied use of progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.关于强化渐进比率程序表的应用
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):155-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-155.
10
The benefits of Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism.斯金纳对自闭症儿童言语行为的分析所带来的益处。
Behav Modif. 2001 Oct;25(5):698-724. doi: 10.1177/0145445501255003.
引用本文的文献
1
From Percentages to Precision: Using Response Rates to Advance Analyses of Procedural Fidelity.从百分比到精准度：利用反应率推进程序保真度分析
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Jan 28;48(1):23-39. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00433-9. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Procedural Fidelity Reporting in from 2007-2021.2007年至2021年期间的程序保真度报告。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2023 Nov 27;40(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s40616-023-00197-w. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
How to Administer the Performance Diagnostic Checklist-Human Services.如何实施《绩效诊断清单 - 人类服务》
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Sep 1;17(1):37-52. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00848-3. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Comparing Multiple Methods to Measure Procedural Fidelity of Discrete-trial Instruction.比较多种测量离散式试验教学程序保真度的方法。
Educ Treat Children. 2023 May 24:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s43494-023-00094-w.
5
Multiple Schedules Facilitate Rapid Noncontingent Reinforcement Schedule Thinning.多种时间表有助于快速进行非连续性强化时间表的稀疏化。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Aug 23;16(1):185-193. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00709-5. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Interobserver agreement and procedural fidelity: An odd asymmetry.观察者间一致性和程序保真度：一种奇怪的不对称性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):78-85. doi: 10.1002/jaba.961. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
7
Treatment Integrity Reporting in 2008-2019.2008 - 2019年治疗完整性报告
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 May 3;15(2):443-453. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00573-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Treatment fidelity in eating disorders and psychological research: Current status and future directions.进食障碍和心理研究中的治疗保真度：现状和未来方向。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Dec;54(12):2121-2131. doi: 10.1002/eat.23624. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
9
Fidelity is not easy! Challenges and guidelines for assessing fidelity in complex interventions.保真度不易！评估复杂干预措施保真度的挑战和指南。
Trials. 2021 May 29;22(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05322-5.
10
Unrecognized implementation science engagement among health researchers in the USA: a national survey.美国健康研究人员中未被认可的实施科学参与情况：一项全国性调查。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Mar 30;1:39. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00027-3. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Titration schedule with rats in a restraining device.在约束装置中用大鼠进行滴定方案。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 May;13(3):339-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-339.
2
The technical drift of applied behavior analysis.应用行为分析的技术漂移。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Summer;13(2):275-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-275.
3
Community applications of instructional technology: training low-income proctors.社区应用教学技术：培训低收入的（医学）助手。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Winter;10(4):747-54. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-747.
4
Effects of peer social initiations on the behavior of withdrawn preschool children.同伴社会引发对退缩型学龄前儿童行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):289-98. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-289.
5
A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.《应用行为分析杂志》中报告的观察性数据收集和可靠性程序综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):97-101. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-97.
6
Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates.观察者间可靠性评估选择的考虑因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):103-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-103.
7
Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation.两种教师讲授速度对开小差行为、正确回答和参与度的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Summer;9(2):199-206. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-199.
8
Shaping data collection congruent with experimental hypotheses.使数据收集与实验假设相一致。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Spring;8(1):43-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-43.
9
The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behavior in the classroom.替代性强化对课堂注意行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):71-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-71.
10
Measuring the reliability of observational data: a reactive process.衡量观测数据的可靠性：一个反应过程。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):175-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-175.
Zotero 插件