• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环氧化酶抑制对接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的黑人和西班牙裔患者血压及肾功能的影响。

Effects of COX inhibition on blood pressure and kidney function in ACE inhibitor-treated blacks and hispanics.

作者信息

Izhar Munavvar, Alausa Tunji, Folker Amy, Hung Elena, Bakris George L

机构信息

Rush Medical Center, 1700 W. Van Buren St, Suite 470, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2004 Mar;43(3):573-7. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000115921.55353.e0. Epub 2004 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1161/01.HYP.0000115921.55353.e0
PMID:14744921
Abstract

Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors attenuate the antihypertensive effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and reduce kidney function. The study tests the hypothesis that these two classes of drugs have similar effects on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and 24-hour blood pressure. The primary endpoint was change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Using a randomized crossover design, 25 black and Hispanic hypertensive participants (mean age 58+/-3 years) with osteoarthritis were studied. All participants received an ACE inhibitor at baseline. Once systolic blood pressure was <140 mm Hg, either celecoxib 200 mg/d or diclofenac 75 mg twice daily for 4 weeks was started. After measurements were obtained, all participants underwent a 2-week washout period and crossed over to the other drug for 4 weeks. A significant difference in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure was noted between groups at 4 weeks (+4.1+/-1.1 mm Hg diclofenac versus +0.6+/-0.6 mm Hg celecoxib; P=0.01). However, because celecoxib has duration of action shorter than 24 hours, we compared ambulatory values at celecoxib trough and peak activities. At peak, no difference in systolic blood pressure was noted between agents (+3.6+/-0.04 mm Hg diclofenac versus +4.2+/-1.9 mm Hg celecoxib; P=0.67). GFR was also differentially affected at 24 hours (-9.9+/-2.4 mL/min diclofenac versus -0.4+/-1.2 mL/min celecoxib; P=0.01). We conclude that diclofenac and celecoxib increase systolic blood pressure at peak levels; however, these agents differ in their 24-hour effects. Differences observed in blood pressure response between COX inhibitors may not be related in their sensitivity but rather their dosing frequency.

摘要

环氧化酶(COX)抑制剂会减弱血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂的降压作用并降低肾功能。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即这两类药物对肾小球滤过率(GFR)和24小时血压有相似的影响。主要终点是24小时收缩压的变化。采用随机交叉设计,对25名患有骨关节炎的黑人和西班牙裔高血压参与者(平均年龄58±3岁)进行了研究。所有参与者在基线时接受一种ACE抑制剂治疗。一旦收缩压<140 mmHg,就开始给予塞来昔布200 mg/d或双氯芬酸75 mg每日两次,持续4周。在获得测量值后,所有参与者都经历了为期2周的洗脱期,然后交叉使用另一种药物4周。4周时,两组之间的平均24小时收缩压存在显著差异(双氯芬酸组为+4.1±1.1 mmHg,塞来昔布组为+0.6±0.6 mmHg;P = 0.01)。然而,由于塞来昔布的作用持续时间短于24小时,我们比较了塞来昔布谷值和峰值活性时的动态血压值。在峰值时,两种药物的收缩压没有差异(双氯芬酸组为+3.6±0.04 mmHg,塞来昔布组为+4.2±1.9 mmHg;P = 0.67)。24小时时GFR也受到不同程度的影响(双氯芬酸组为-9.9±2.4 mL/min,塞来昔布组为-0.4±1.2 mL/min;P = 0.01)。我们得出结论,双氯芬酸和塞来昔布在峰值水平时会升高收缩压;然而,这些药物在24小时的作用有所不同。COX抑制剂之间观察到的血压反应差异可能与其敏感性无关,而与其给药频率有关。

相似文献

1
Effects of COX inhibition on blood pressure and kidney function in ACE inhibitor-treated blacks and hispanics.环氧化酶抑制对接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的黑人和西班牙裔患者血压及肾功能的影响。
Hypertension. 2004 Mar;43(3):573-7. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000115921.55353.e0. Epub 2004 Jan 26.
2
Effects of celecoxib on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients on ACE inhibitors.塞来昔布对服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的高血压患者动态血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2002 Apr;39(4):929-34. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000014323.99765.16.
3
Effects of celecoxib and diclofenac on blood pressure, renal function, and vasoactive prostanoids in young and elderly subjects.塞来昔布和双氯芬酸对年轻及老年受试者血压、肾功能和血管活性前列腺素的影响。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Sep;42(9):985-94.
4
Differential effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on endothelial function in salt-induced hypertension.选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂对盐诱导高血压患者内皮功能的不同影响
Circulation. 2003 Nov 11;108(19):2308-11. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000101683.30157.0B. Epub 2003 Nov 3.
5
Cardiorenal effects of celecoxib as compared with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs diclofenac and ibuprofen.
Kidney Int. 2006 Oct;70(8):1495-502. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001766. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
6
Racial differences in the renal response to blood pressure lowering during chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison of fosinopril and lisinopril in older hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency.慢性血管紧张素转换酶抑制期间肾脏对血压降低反应的种族差异:福辛普利和赖诺普利在老年慢性肾功能不全高血压患者中的前瞻性双盲随机对照比较
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Jun;29(6):897-906. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90464-9.
7
Effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on blood pressure.
Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Mar;37(3):442-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C277.
8
Effects of celecoxib and rofecoxib on blood pressure and edema in patients > or =65 years of age with systemic hypertension and osteoarthritis.塞来昔布和罗非昔布对年龄≥65岁的系统性高血压合并骨关节炎患者血压及水肿的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Nov 1;90(9):959-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02661-9.
9
Cyclooxygenase-2--specific inhibitors and cardiorenal function: a randomized, controlled trial of celecoxib and rofecoxib in older hypertensive osteoarthritis patients.环氧化酶-2特异性抑制剂与心肾功能:塞来昔布和罗非昔布用于老年高血压性骨关节炎患者的一项随机对照试验
Am J Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;8(2):85-95. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200103000-00003.
10
The Effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with hypertension, osteoarthritis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.环氧化酶-2抑制剂和非甾体抗炎治疗对高血压、骨关节炎和2型糖尿病患者24小时血压的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24;165(2):161-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.2.161.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Challenges of Diclofenac-Based Novel Therapeutics: Targeting Cancer and Complex Diseases.基于双氯芬酸的新型疗法的发展与挑战:针对癌症和复杂疾病
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 9;14(18):4385. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184385.
2
Inflammatory signalling in atrial cardiomyocytes: a novel unifying principle in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology.心房肌细胞中的炎症信号转导:心房颤动病理生理学中的一个新的统一原则。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Mar;20(3):145-167. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00759-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
The effective interplay of (non-) selective NSAIDs with neostigmine in animal models of analgesia and inflammation.
(非)选择性 NSAIDs 与新斯的明在镇痛和炎症动物模型中的有效相互作用。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021 May 1;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40360-021-00488-9.
4
Cyclo-Oxygenase (COX) Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Risk: Are Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Really Anti-Inflammatory?环氧化酶(COX)抑制剂与心血管风险:非甾体抗炎药真的具有抗炎作用吗?
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 30;20(17):4262. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174262.
5
Are All Oral COX-2 Selective Inhibitors the Same? A Consideration of Celecoxib, Etoricoxib, and Diclofenac.所有口服COX-2选择性抑制剂都一样吗?对塞来昔布、依托考昔和双氯芬酸的思考。
Int J Rheumatol. 2018 Dec 9;2018:1302835. doi: 10.1155/2018/1302835. eCollection 2018.
6
Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.耐药性高血压:检测、评估与管理:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Hypertension. 2018 Nov;72(5):e53-e90. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084.
7
[Pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis-related pain].[骨关节炎相关疼痛的药物治疗]
Schmerz. 2019 Feb;33(1):30-48. doi: 10.1007/s00482-018-0286-6.
8
Effect of ibuprofen vs acetaminophen on postpartum hypertension in preeclampsia with severe features: a double-masked, randomized controlled trial.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚对重度表现子痫前期产后高血压的影响:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):616.e1-616.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Differential blood pressure effects of ibuprofen, naproxen, and celecoxib in patients with arthritis: the PRECISION-ABPM (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety Versus Ibuprofen or Naproxen Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement) Trial.关节炎患者中布洛芬、萘普生和塞来昔布的血压差异效应:PRECISION-ABPM(塞来昔布综合安全性与布洛芬或萘普生动态血压测量前瞻性随机评估)试验。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 21;38(44):3282-3292. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx508.
10
Square Wave Voltammetric Determination of Diclofenac in Pharmaceutical Preparations and Human Serum.方波伏安法测定药物制剂和人血清中的双氯芬酸
Iran J Pharm Res. 2015 Summer;14(3):715-22.