Laitko Ulrike, Morris Catherine E
Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4E9.
J Gen Physiol. 2004 Feb;123(2):135-54. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308965.
A classical voltage-sensitive channel is tension sensitive--the kinetics of Shaker and S3-S4 linker deletion mutants change with membrane stretch (Tabarean, I.V., and C.E. Morris. 2002. Biophys. J. 82:2982-2994.). Does stretch distort the channel protein, producing novel channel states, or, more interestingly, are existing transitions inherently tension sensitive? We examined stretch and voltage dependence of mutant 5aa, whose ultra-simple activation (Gonzalez, C., E. Rosenman, F. Bezanilla, O. Alvarez, and R. Latorre. 2000. J. Gen. Physiol. 115:193-208.) and temporally matched activation and slow inactivation were ideal for these studies. We focused on macroscopic patch current parameters related to elementary channel transitions: maximum slope and delay of current rise, and time constant of current decline. Stretch altered the magnitude of these parameters, but not, or minimally, their voltage dependence. Maximum slope and delay versus voltage with and without stretch as well as current rising phases were well described by expressions derived for an irreversible four-step activation model, indicating there is no separate stretch-activated opening pathway. This model, with slow inactivation added, explains most of our data. From this we infer that the voltage-dependent activation path is inherently stretch sensitive. Simulated currents for schemes with additional activation steps were compared against datasets; this showed that generally, additional complexity was not called for. Because the voltage sensitivities of activation and inactivation differ, it was not possible to substitute depolarization for stretch so as to produce the same overall PO time course. What we found, however, was that at a given voltage, stretch-accelerated current rise and decline almost identically--normalized current traces with and without stretch could be matched by a rescaling of time. Rate-limitation of the current falling phase by activation was ruled out. We hypothesize, therefore, that stretch-induced bilayer decompression facilitates an in-plane expansion of the protein in both activation and inactivation. Dynamic structural models of this class of channels will need to take into account the inherent mechanosensitivity of voltage-dependent gating.
经典的电压敏感通道对张力敏感——Shaker通道及S3-S4连接子缺失突变体的动力学随膜拉伸而改变(塔巴雷安,I.V.,以及C.E. 莫里斯。2002年。《生物物理学杂志》82:2982 - 2994)。拉伸是使通道蛋白变形,产生新的通道状态,还是更有趣的是,现有的转变本身就对张力敏感呢?我们研究了突变体5aa的拉伸和电压依赖性,该突变体的激活极其简单(冈萨雷斯,C.,E. 罗森曼,F. 贝扎尼拉,O. 阿尔瓦雷斯,以及R. 拉托雷。2000年。《普通生理学杂志》115:193 - 208),其激活和时间匹配的激活及缓慢失活非常适合这些研究。我们关注与基本通道转变相关的宏观膜片电流参数:电流上升的最大斜率和延迟,以及电流下降的时间常数。拉伸改变了这些参数的大小,但对其电压依赖性没有影响,或影响极小。有拉伸和无拉伸情况下最大斜率和延迟与电压的关系以及电流上升阶段,都能用不可逆四步激活模型推导的表达式很好地描述,这表明不存在单独的拉伸激活开放途径。这个模型加上缓慢失活,解释了我们的大部分数据。由此我们推断,电压依赖性激活途径本身对拉伸敏感。将具有额外激活步骤的方案的模拟电流与数据集进行比较;这表明一般来说,不需要额外的复杂性。由于激活和失活的电压敏感性不同,不可能用去极化替代拉伸来产生相同的总体开放概率时间进程。然而,我们发现,在给定电压下,拉伸几乎同样加速电流的上升和下降——有拉伸和无拉伸情况下的归一化电流轨迹可以通过时间重标来匹配。排除了激活对电流下降阶段的速率限制。因此,我们假设拉伸诱导的双层减压促进了蛋白质在激活和失活过程中的平面内扩张。这类通道的动态结构模型将需要考虑电压依赖性门控固有的机械敏感性。