Suppr超能文献

用于老年长期护理居民的疼痛评估工具比较。

A comparison of pain-assessment tools for use with elderly long-term-care residents.

作者信息

Kaasalainen Sharon, Crook Joan

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 2003 Dec;35(4):58-71.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties (test-retest and interrater reliability, criterion concurrent validity) of 3 verbal pain-assessment tools (Faces Pain Scale, Numerical Rating Scale, Present Pain Intensity Scale) and a behavioural pain-assessment scale for use with an elderly population. The study used a repeated-measures design to examine the reliability and validity of the tools across 4 groups of participants with varying levels of cognitive impairment using a non-random stratified sample of 130 elderly long-term-care residents. The findings support the test-retest and interrater reliability of the behavioural pain-assessment tool across all levels of cognitive impairment, whereas the same measures of reliability for the verbal-report tools decreased with increasing cognitive impairment; however, the majority of elderly with mild to moderate cognitive impairment were able to complete at least 1 of these tools. The findings are discussed in relation to their clinical and research implications.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验三种言语疼痛评估工具(面部疼痛量表、数字评定量表、当前疼痛强度量表)和一种行为疼痛评估量表用于老年人群时的心理测量特性(重测信度和评定者间信度、效标效度)。该研究采用重复测量设计,通过对130名老年长期护理居民的非随机分层样本进行研究,检验这些工具在4组认知障碍程度不同的参与者中的信度和效度。研究结果支持行为疼痛评估工具在所有认知障碍水平下的重测信度和评定者间信度,而言语报告工具的相同信度指标随认知障碍程度的增加而降低;然而,大多数轻度至中度认知障碍的老年人能够完成这些工具中的至少一种。文中对研究结果的临床和研究意义进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验