• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同时期(青铜时代、19世纪和现代)颅骨的头影测量比较。

A cephalometric comparison of skulls from different time periods--the Bronze Age, the 19th century and the present.

作者信息

Jonke Erwin, Schaefer Katrin, Freudenthaler Josef W, Prossinger Hermann, Bookstein Fred L

机构信息

Vienna University Clinic of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2003 Dec;27(2):789-801.

PMID:14746172
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate secular trends by means of orthodontic measurements on lateral cephalograms. We use roentgenograms from three populations: 22 Bronze Age skulls from a cemetery near Hainburg/Austria, 140 soldiers who served in the Hapsburg Imperial Army in the late 19th century, and 154 contemporary recruits of the Austrian Federal Army. Using conventional morphometric analysis, no statistically significant differences could be established. But applying geometric morphometrics to the 2D-coordinates of the pentagon composed of the landmarks Sella, Nasion, Articulare, Gonion and Menton, some biologically interpretable differences were detected, the size allometry between the 19th- and 20th-century populations being the only notable one. We conclude that landmarks should be digitized directly (and many more of them) and that conventional methods used in clinical orthodontics are inappropriate for addressing the scientific questions approached here.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过对头颅侧位片进行正畸测量来评估长期趋势。我们使用了来自三个群体的X线片:奥地利海恩堡附近一座墓地出土的22个青铜时代头骨、19世纪末在哈布斯堡帝国军队服役的140名士兵,以及奥地利联邦军队的154名当代新兵。使用传统形态计量学分析,未发现统计学上的显著差异。但将几何形态计量学应用于由蝶鞍、鼻根点、关节点、下颌角点和颏下点组成的五边形的二维坐标时,检测到了一些具有生物学意义的差异,19世纪和20世纪人群之间的大小异速生长是唯一显著的差异。我们得出结论,应该直接对头影测量标志点进行数字化(并且要更多的标志点),并且临床正畸学中使用的传统方法不适用于解决这里提出的科学问题。

相似文献

1
A cephalometric comparison of skulls from different time periods--the Bronze Age, the 19th century and the present.不同时期(青铜时代、19世纪和现代)颅骨的头影测量比较。
Coll Antropol. 2003 Dec;27(2):789-801.
2
Secular trends in the facial skull from the 19th century to the present, analyzed with geometric morphometrics.运用几何形态测量学分析19世纪至今面部颅骨的长期变化趋势。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.040.
3
Secular trends in the European male facial skull from the Migration Period to the present: a cephalometric study.从迁徙时期到现代欧洲男性面部颅骨的长期趋势:一项头影测量研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):614-20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn065.
4
Why did the frequency of palatine torus increase in the ancient Anatolian populations?
Homo. 2008;59(5):365-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
5
A cephalometric comparison of skulls from the fourteenth, sixteenth and twentieth centuries.
Br Dent J. 2006 Jan 14;200(1):33-7; discussion 25; quiz 50. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813122.
6
Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.传统头颅侧位片与锥形束计算机断层扫描生成的头颅侧位片的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):798-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.008.
7
Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 10: midcentury retrospect.三千年的正畸学。第10章:世纪中叶回顾。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.019.
8
A cephalometric morphometric study of the sella turcica.蝶鞍的头影测量形态学研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):449-56. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm048.
9
Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.三维胎儿头部测量法:基于三维CT重建和绵羊胎儿干颅骨对头测量可靠性的评估
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005 Aug;33(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.02.003.
10
A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.扫描的头颅侧位片与相应原始X光片的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.029.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of size and shape differences between ancient and present-day Italian crania using metrics and geometric morphometrics based on multislice computed tomography.基于多层计算机断层扫描,使用测量指标和几何形态测量学分析古代和现代意大利颅骨的大小和形状差异。
Forensic Sci Res. 2017 Jun 20;2(2):85-92. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2017.1338041. eCollection 2017.
2
Geometric morphometrics of rodent sperm head shape.啮齿动物精子头部形状的几何形态测量学。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e80607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080607. eCollection 2013.
3
Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc based on a recent skull collection.
基于近期头骨收集数据,使用Fordisc对头骨残骸进行性别分析的准确性。
Int J Legal Med. 2007 Nov;121(6):477-82. doi: 10.1007/s00414-007-0199-x.