• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗重症监护病房实施安全有效的胰岛素输注方案。

Implementation of a safe and effective insulin infusion protocol in a medical intensive care unit.

作者信息

Goldberg Philip A, Siegel Mark D, Sherwin Robert S, Halickman Joshua I, Lee Michelle, Bailey Valerie A, Lee Sandy L, Dziura James D, Inzucchi Silvio E

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):461-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.461.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.27.2.461
PMID:14747229
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In a recent randomized controlled trial, lowering blood glucose levels to 80-110 mg/dl improved clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. In that study, the insulin infusion protocol (IIP) used to normalize blood glucose levels provided valuable guidelines for adjusting insulin therapy. In our hands, however, ongoing expert supervision was required to effectively manage the insulin infusions. This work describes our early experience with a safe, effective, nurse-implemented IIP that provides detailed insulin dosing instructions and requires minimal physician input.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We collected data from 52 medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients who were placed on the IIP. Blood glucose levels were the primary outcome measurement. Relevant clinical variables and insulin requirements were also recorded. MICU nurses were surveyed regarding their experience with the IIP.

RESULTS

To date, our IIP has been employed 69 times in 52 patients admitted to an MICU. Using the IIP, the median time to reach target blood glucose levels (100-139 mg/dl) was 9 h. Once blood glucose levels fell below 140 mg/dl, 52% of 5,808 subsequent hourly blood glucose values fell within our narrow target range; 66% within a "clinically desirable" range of 80-139 mg/dl; and 93% within a "clinically acceptable" range of 80-199 mg/dl. Only 20 (0.3%) blood glucose values were <60 mg/dl, none of which resulted in clinically significant adverse events. In general, the IIP was readily accepted by our MICU nursing staff, most of whom rated the protocol as both clinically effective and easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nurse-implemented IIP is safe and effective in improving glycemic control in critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

在最近一项随机对照试验中,将血糖水平降至80 - 110mg/dl可改善重症患者的临床结局。在该研究中,用于使血糖水平正常化的胰岛素输注方案(IIP)为调整胰岛素治疗提供了有价值的指导。然而,在我们实际操作中,需要持续的专家监督才能有效管理胰岛素输注。本研究描述了我们在一种安全、有效的由护士实施的IIP方面的早期经验,该方案提供了详细的胰岛素给药说明,且只需医生极少的参与。

研究设计与方法

我们收集了52例接受IIP治疗的医学重症监护病房(MICU)患者的数据。血糖水平是主要的结局指标。还记录了相关的临床变量和胰岛素需求情况。对MICU护士就其使用IIP的经验进行了调查。

结果

迄今为止,我们的IIP已在52例入住MICU的患者中使用了69次。使用IIP时,达到目标血糖水平(100 - 139mg/dl)的中位时间为9小时。一旦血糖水平降至140mg/dl以下,在随后的5808次每小时血糖值中,52%落在我们设定的狭窄目标范围内;66%落在“临床理想”范围80 - 139mg/dl内;93%落在“临床可接受”范围80 - 199mg/dl内。只有20个(0.3%)血糖值<60mg/dl,且均未导致具有临床意义的不良事件。总体而言,我们的MICU护理人员很容易接受IIP,他们中的大多数人认为该方案在临床上有效且易于使用。

结论

我们由护士实施的IIP在改善重症患者血糖控制方面是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a safe and effective insulin infusion protocol in a medical intensive care unit.在医疗重症监护病房实施安全有效的胰岛素输注方案。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):461-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.461.
2
Improving glycemic control in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit: clinical experience in two hospital settings.改善心胸外科重症监护病房的血糖控制:两家医院的临床经验。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Dec;18(6):690-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.08.003.
3
Comparison of a nurse initiated insulin infusion protocol for intensive insulin therapy between adult surgical trauma, medical and coronary care intensive care patients.成人外科创伤、内科及冠心病监护重症监护患者中护士启动胰岛素输注方案用于强化胰岛素治疗的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2007 Aug 29;7:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-7-14.
4
Adapting to the new consensus guidelines for managing hyperglycemia during critical illness: the updated Yale insulin infusion protocol.适应危重症患者血糖管理新共识指南:耶鲁胰岛素输注方案更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):363-70. doi: 10.4158/EP11260.OR.
5
Safety and Efficacy of an Intensive Care Insulin Infusion Protocol Targeting a Blood Glucose of 140 to 180 mg/dL.
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Feb 15:10600280221074683. doi: 10.1177/10600280221074683.
6
Performance of a dose-defining insulin infusion protocol among trauma service intensive care unit admissions.创伤服务重症监护病房入院患者中剂量确定胰岛素输注方案的实施情况。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006 Aug;8(4):476-88. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.8.476.
7
Memoirs of a root canal salesman: the successful implementation of a hospital-wide intravenous insulin infusion protocol.
Endocr Pract. 2006 Jul-Aug;12 Suppl 3:79-85. doi: 10.4158/EP.12.S3.79.
8
Nurse-led implementation of a safe and effective intravenous insulin protocol in a medical intensive care unit.护士主导在医疗重症监护病房实施安全有效的静脉胰岛素方案。
Crit Care Nurse. 2011 Dec;31(6):27-35. doi: 10.4037/ccn2011934.
9
A unified Hyperglycemia and Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) insulin infusion protocol based on an Excel algorithm and implemented via Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in Intensive Care Units.一种基于Excel算法并通过重症监护病房的电子病历(EMR)实施的统一高血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)胰岛素输注方案。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
A randomized controlled trial comparing a computer-assisted insulin infusion protocol with a strict and a conventional protocol for glucose control in critically ill patients.一项随机对照试验,比较计算机辅助胰岛素输注方案与严格及传统方案对危重症患者血糖控制的效果。
J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;24(3):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Peri-Liver Transplant Hyperglycemia: Mechanisms, Associated Factors, Consequences, and Management - A Systematic Review.肝移植围手术期高血糖:机制、相关因素、后果及管理——一项系统综述
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Sep;8(5):e70107. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70107.
2
Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Intravenous Insulin Protocol Modified for East Asians in Postoperative Glycemic Management Following Pancreatectomy.一种为东亚人改良的持续静脉注射胰岛素方案在胰腺切除术后血糖管理中的疗效和安全性
Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84527. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Perioperative glycemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
心脏手术患者围手术期的血糖控制
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2025 Mar;22(1):44-52. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2025.148548. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
[Hospital diabetes management (Update 2023)].[医院糖尿病管理(2023年更新)]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jan;135(Suppl 1):242-255. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02177-5. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
5
Perioperative blood glucose variability and autonomic nervous system activity in on-pump cardiac surgery patients: Study protocol of a single-center observational study.心脏不停跳搭桥手术患者围术期血糖变异性与自主神经系统活动的关系:一项单中心观察性研究方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 25;101(47):e31821. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031821.
6
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.美国临床内分泌学会临床实践指南:制定糖尿病综合护理计划-2022 更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Oct;28(10):923-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
7
Glucose-lowering therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的降糖治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Oct 1;17(8):e618-e630. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01250.
8
GlucoSTRESS - A project to optimize glycemic control in a level C (III) Portuguese intensive care unit.GlucoSTRESS - 一个优化 C 级(III 级)葡萄牙重症监护病房血糖控制的项目。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):138-145. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210015.
9
Optimal Blood Glucose Monitoring Interval for Insulin Infusion in Critically Ill Non-Cardiothoracic Patients: A Pilot Study.危重症非心胸外科患者胰岛素输注时的最佳血糖监测间隔:一项初步研究。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Feb 25;92(1):e2021036. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.9083.
10
Monitoring the Impact of Aggressive Glycemic Intervention during Critical Care after Cardiac Surgery with a Glycemic Expert System for Nurse-Implemented Euglycemia: The MAGIC GENIE Project.监测心脏手术后重症监护期间强化血糖干预的影响:使用血糖专家系统实现护士实施的血糖正常化的 MAGIC GENIE 项目。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):251-264. doi: 10.1177/1932296821995568.