• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管通路与全因死亡率:一项倾向评分分析。

Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Polkinghorne Kevan R, McDonald Stephen P, Atkins Robert C, Kerr Peter G

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Feb;15(2):477-86. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000109668.05157.05.

DOI:10.1097/01.asn.0000109668.05157.05
PMID:14747396
Abstract

The native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access because of its longevity and its lower rates of infection and intervention. Recent studies suggest that the AVF may offer a survival advantage. Because these data were derived from observational studies, they are prone to potential bias. The use of propensity scores offers an additional method to reduce bias resulting from nonrandomized treatment assignment. Adult (age 18 yr or more) patients who commenced hemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand on April 1, 1999, until March 31, 2002, were studied by using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association (ANZDATA) Registry. Cox regression was used to determine the effect of access type on total mortality. Propensity scores were calculated and used both as a controlling variable in the multivariable model and to construct matched cohorts. The catheter analysis was stratified by dialysis duration at entry to ANZDATA to satisfy the proportional-hazard assumption. There were 612 deaths in 3749 patients (median follow-up, 1.07 yr). After adjustment for confounding factors and propensity scores, catheter use was predictive of mortality. Patients with arteriovenous grafts (AVG) also had a significantly increased risk of death. Effect estimates were also consistent in the smaller propensity score-matched cohorts. Both AVG and catheter use in incident hemodialysis patients are associated with significant excess of total mortality. Reducing catheter use and increasing the proportion of patients commencing hemodialysis with a mature AVF remain important clinical objectives.

摘要

自体动静脉内瘘(AVF)因其使用寿命长、感染率和干预率低,是首选的血管通路。最近的研究表明,AVF可能具有生存优势。由于这些数据来自观察性研究,容易产生潜在偏差。使用倾向评分提供了一种额外的方法来减少非随机治疗分配导致的偏差。对1999年4月1日至2002年3月31日在澳大利亚和新西兰开始进行血液透析的成年(18岁及以上)患者,利用澳大利亚和新西兰透析与移植协会(ANZDATA)登记处的数据进行了研究。采用Cox回归来确定通路类型对总死亡率的影响。计算倾向评分,并将其用作多变量模型中的控制变量以及构建匹配队列。对导管的分析根据进入ANZDATA时的透析持续时间进行分层,以满足比例风险假设。3749例患者中有612例死亡(中位随访时间为1.07年)。在对混杂因素和倾向评分进行调整后,使用导管可预测死亡率。使用动静脉移植物(AVG)的患者死亡风险也显著增加。在较小的倾向评分匹配队列中,效应估计也一致。新发血液透析患者使用AVG和导管均与总死亡率显著增加相关。减少导管的使用以及增加开始血液透析时使用成熟AVF的患者比例仍然是重要的临床目标。

相似文献

1
Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis.血管通路与全因死亡率:一项倾向评分分析。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Feb;15(2):477-86. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000109668.05157.05.
2
Hemodialysis vascular access and clinical outcomes: an observational multicenter study.血液透析血管通路与临床结局:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2017 Jan 18;18(1):35-42. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000610. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
3
Health status as a potential mediator of the association between hemodialysis vascular access and mortality.健康状况作为血液透析血管通路与死亡率之间关联的潜在中介因素。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Apr;29(4):892-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft438. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Patients started on hemodialysis with tunneled dialysis catheter have similar survival after arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft creation.开始使用带隧道的透析导管进行血液透析的患者,在动静脉内瘘和动静脉移植物建立后的生存率相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec;62(6):1590-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.076. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
5
Effect of Age on the Association of Vascular Access Type with Mortality in a Cohort of Incident End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.年龄对初发终末期肾病患者队列中血管通路类型与死亡率关联的影响。
Nephron. 2017;137(1):57-63. doi: 10.1159/000477271. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
The Impact of Vascular Access Types on Hemodialysis Patient Long-term Survival.血管通路类型对血液透析患者长期生存的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47065-z.
7
Conversion of vascular access type among incident hemodialysis patients: description and association with mortality.新接受血液透析患者的血管通路类型转换:描述及其与死亡率的关联
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 May;53(5):804-14. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.031. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
8
Delayed conversion from central venous catheter to non-catheter hemodialysis access associates with an increased risk of death: A retrospective cohort study based on data from a large dialysis provider.从中心静脉导管转为非导管血液透析通路延迟与死亡风险增加相关:基于大型透析提供者数据的回顾性队列研究。
Hemodial Int. 2020 Jul;24(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12831. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Mortality benefits of different hemodialysis access types are age dependent.不同血液透析通路类型的死亡率获益与年龄相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):449-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.091. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
10
Epidemiology of vascular access in the Australian hemodialysis population.澳大利亚血液透析人群血管通路的流行病学
Kidney Int. 2003 Nov;64(5):1893-902. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00277.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An AIoT-Based Home Monitoring System for Arteriovenous Fistula Surveillance in Hemodialysis Patients: Development, Evaluation, and Clinical Potential.一种基于人工智能物联网的血液透析患者动静脉内瘘监测居家系统:开发、评估及临床潜力
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 29;18:5313-5326. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S531248. eCollection 2025.
2
Patterns and outcomes of vascular access in hemodialysis: a nationwide registry-based study from Romania.血液透析中血管通路的模式与结局:一项基于罗马尼亚全国登记处的研究
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2514830. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2514830. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Associations between initial dialysis access types and death from dialysis withdrawal in incident patients with kidney failure.
初发肾衰竭患者初始透析通路类型与因停止透析导致死亡之间的关联。
Clin Kidney J. 2025 Jan 29;18(3):sfaf024. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Asian Hemodialysis Patients: A 15-Year Study From Pakistan.影响亚洲血液透析患者死亡率的危险因素:来自巴基斯坦的一项15年研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 12;17(1):e77328. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77328. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Nurses' knowledge toward hemodialysis vascular access devices: A cross-sectional study in Palestine.护士对血液透析血管通路装置的认知:巴勒斯坦的一项横断面研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Oct 29;12:20503121241264444. doi: 10.1177/20503121241264444. eCollection 2024.
6
Validation of arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification: a prospective, international multicentre study.动静脉通路阶段(AVAS)分类的验证:一项前瞻性国际多中心研究。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Aug 30;17(9):sfae272. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae272. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Vascular access type and prognosis in elderly hemodialysis patients: a propensity-score-matched study.血管通路类型与老年血液透析患者预后的关系:倾向评分匹配研究。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2387205. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2387205. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
8
Predicting factors for early failure of vascular access in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者血管通路早期失功的预测因素
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 May;106(5):255-262. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.255. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
9
Primary and specialist care interaction and referral patterns for individuals with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review.慢性肾脏病患者的初级保健和专科医疗互动及转诊模式:叙事性综述。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Apr 30;25(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03585-z.
10
Incidence and Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Prospective Cohort Study.维持性血液透析患者急性冠状动脉综合征的发病率及预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2024 Mar;40(2):191-199. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202403_40(2).20231022A.