Lasseter Kenneth C, Dilzer Stacy C, Vargas Ramon, Waldman Scott, Noveck Robert J
Clinical Pharmacology Associates, Miami, Florida 33142, USA.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(2):121-9. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443020-00004.
To assess the differences between patients with hepatic insufficiency and healthy subjects with regard to the pharmacokinetics, cardiac safety and overall safety of ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine.
Open-label parallel-group study.
24 patients with varying degrees of hepatic insufficiency, as categorised by the Child-Pugh classification, and 12 healthy volunteers.
Healthy subjects and patients with Child-Pugh class A (n = 8) or B (n = 8) received ebastine 20 mg once daily for 7 days. Patients with Child-Pugh class C (n = 8) [single or repeated dose] received ebastine 10 mg. Plasma concentrations of ebastine and carebastine were determined for 23.5 hours following the initial dose on day 1 and for 96 hours following the dose on day 7 by using a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay with a minimum quantifiable limit of 0.05 microg/L for ebastine and 1.00 microg/L for carebastine. Hepatic function was assessed by blood clearance of indocyanine green 0.5 mg/kg administered intravenously on day 2. Cardiac and overall safety parameters were monitored.
Overall, the pharmacokinetics of ebastine were not modified by hepatic impairment. No correlation between ebastine pharmacokinetics and hepatic function, as expressed by indocyanine green clearance, was observed. Comparison of the effective half-life of ebastine and carebastine between groups did not show relevant differences. Therefore, no apparent accumulation of ebastine occurred, and steady-state concentrations of ebastine and carebastine were predictable from single-dose pharmacokinetics both in healthy subjects and in hepatically impaired patients. Finally, no apparent difference was noted in the safety of ebastine between patients with hepatic insufficiency and healthy subjects as assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs and laboratory parameters.
Ebastine can be safely administered to patients with impaired hepatic function, as no clinically important differences can be anticipated from the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of ebastine/carebastine as compared with healthy subjects. Nevertheless, the dosage used in severely impaired patients (10mg daily) was half that used in patients with mild to moderate impairment, and any comedication did not include drugs affecting liver function; in clinical practice, both these factors should be taken into account.
评估肝功能不全患者与健康受试者在依巴斯汀及其活性代谢产物卡瑞巴斯汀的药代动力学、心脏安全性和总体安全性方面的差异。
开放标签平行组研究。
24例根据Child-Pugh分类法划分的不同程度肝功能不全患者,以及12名健康志愿者。
健康受试者和Child-Pugh A级(n = 8)或B级(n = 8)患者每日一次口服20 mg依巴斯汀,共7天。Child-Pugh C级(n = 8)患者[单次或重复给药]口服10 mg依巴斯汀。在第1天首次给药后23.5小时以及第7天给药后96小时,采用灵敏的液相色谱-串联质谱分析法测定依巴斯汀和卡瑞巴斯汀的血浆浓度,依巴斯汀的最低可定量限为0.05 μg/L,卡瑞巴斯汀为1.00 μg/L。在第2天静脉注射0.5 mg/kg吲哚菁绿后通过其血清除率评估肝功能。监测心脏和总体安全性参数。
总体而言,肝功能损害未改变依巴斯汀的药代动力学。未观察到依巴斯汀药代动力学与以吲哚菁绿清除率表示的肝功能之间存在相关性。各小组间依巴斯汀和卡瑞巴斯汀的有效半衰期比较未显示出相关差异。因此,依巴斯汀未出现明显蓄积,健康受试者和肝功能受损患者单剂量药代动力学均可预测依巴斯汀和卡瑞巴斯汀的稳态浓度。最后,通过评估不良事件、生命体征和实验室参数发现,肝功能不全患者与健康受试者在依巴斯汀安全性方面未发现明显差异。
依巴斯汀可安全用于肝功能受损患者,因为与健康受试者相比,依巴斯汀/卡瑞巴斯汀的药代动力学和安全性方面预计无临床重要差异。然而,严重肝功能受损患者的用药剂量(每日10 mg)是轻度至中度受损患者的一半,且任何合并用药均不包括影响肝功能的药物;在临床实践中,这两个因素均应予以考虑。