Baeten Jared M, Richardson Barbra A, Bankson Daniel D, Wener Mark H, Kreiss Joan K, Lavreys Ludo, Mandaliya Kishorchandra, Bwayo Job J, McClelland R Scott
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Feb;79(2):218-25. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.2.218.
Serum retinol is the most commonly used indicator of vitamin A status. Retinol is transported in a 1-to-1 complex with retinol-binding protein (RBP). RBP is easy and inexpensive to measure, and studies have shown a high correlation between concentrations of RBP and concentrations of retinol. The performance of RBP in the context of infection or protein malnutrition, however, has not been evaluated.
Our aim was to determine whether RBP is a good surrogate measure for retinol in the context of HIV-1 infection, protein malnutrition, and the acute phase response.
The relation between RBP and retinol was examined in a cross-sectional study of 600 Kenyan women.
There was a high correlation between concentrations of RBP and those of retinol (r = 0.88). When equimolar cutoffs were used, RBP predicted marginal vitamin A status (retinol < 1.05 micro mol/L) with 93% sensitivity and 75% specificity and vitamin A deficiency (retinol < 0.70 micro mol/L) with 91% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Similarly high sensitivities and specificities were found among subgroups with HIV-1 infection, a positive acute phase response, and protein malnutrition. Protein malnutrition and a positive acute phase response were common, especially among HIV-1-infected women, and were independently and synergistically associated with lower RBP concentrations.
Equimolar RBP cutoffs predict vitamin A deficiency with high sensitivity and specificity, even in the context of infection and protein malnutrition. Like retinol, RBP may not accurately identify true vitamin A status under all conditions, because the acute phase response and protein malnutrition depress RBP concentrations. However, RBP may be a simple, inexpensive tool for assessment of vitamin A deficiency in population studies.
血清视黄醇是最常用于评估维生素A状态的指标。视黄醇与视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)以1:1的复合物形式运输。RBP易于测量且成本低廉,研究表明RBP浓度与视黄醇浓度之间存在高度相关性。然而,尚未评估RBP在感染或蛋白质营养不良情况下的表现。
我们的目的是确定在HIV-1感染、蛋白质营养不良和急性期反应的情况下,RBP是否是视黄醇的良好替代指标。
在一项对600名肯尼亚女性的横断面研究中,研究了RBP与视黄醇之间的关系。
RBP浓度与视黄醇浓度之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.88)。当使用等摩尔临界值时,RBP预测边缘性维生素A状态(视黄醇<1.05微摩尔/升)的灵敏度为93%,特异性为75%;预测维生素A缺乏(视黄醇<0.70微摩尔/升)的灵敏度为91%,特异性为94%。在HIV-1感染、急性期反应阳性和蛋白质营养不良的亚组中也发现了同样高的灵敏度和特异性。蛋白质营养不良和急性期反应阳性很常见,尤其是在HIV-1感染的女性中,并且与较低的RBP浓度独立且协同相关。
即使在感染和蛋白质营养不良的情况下,等摩尔RBP临界值也能以高灵敏度和特异性预测维生素A缺乏。与视黄醇一样,RBP在所有情况下可能无法准确识别真正的维生素A状态,因为急性期反应和蛋白质营养不良会降低RBP浓度。然而,RBP可能是人群研究中评估维生素A缺乏的一种简单、廉价的工具。