Yen Yung-Chieh, Lung For-Wey, Chong Mian-Yoon
Department of Psychiatry, Military Kaohsiung General Hospital, 2 Chung Cheng 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 802, Taiwan.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;28(2):285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.10.006.
Side effects of pharmacological treatment in schizophrenia continue to be a major issue in spite of the development of new antipsychotics. The aim of this study is to explore the adverse effects of conventional and atypical antipsychotic drugs and their associated factors.
Over 3 months, 41 patients with schizophrenia were randomized to treatment with risperidone 1-12 mg (n=21) or haloperidol 2-20 mg (n=20) daily. Efficacy was assessed by improvement of psychotic symptoms, measured on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The safety and tolerability were assessed with the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale and clinical laboratory assessments.
Each treatment reduced psychotic symptoms. PANSS total scores, positive scores, and general psychopathology scores declined as trial went on without significant differences between the two groups. While PANSS negative scores improved better in the risperidone group than in the haloperidol group. The tolerability of antipsychotics was statistical significantly better in the risperidone than in the haloperidol-treated patients. The most frequent adverse effects for both groups were tremor and rigidity. Antipsychotics, their doses, and hyperprolactinemia predict short-term extrapyramidal side effects. Serum prolactin levels could predict parkinsonism and dyskinesia severity. However, dyskinesia was best predicted by the doses of neuroleptics. The predictive factor of dystonia was the antipsychotic drug itself. After adjusting drug doses and concomitant medications, side effects could be markedly improved.
This study suggested that risperidone was superior to haloperidol in improving negative symptoms and better tolerated during the 12 weeks' treatment of schizophrenia. Serum prolactin levels could predict the severity of parkinsonism and dyskinesia.
尽管新型抗精神病药物不断发展,但精神分裂症药物治疗的副作用仍然是一个主要问题。本研究旨在探讨传统和非典型抗精神病药物的不良反应及其相关因素。
在3个多月的时间里,将41例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,分别接受每日1 - 12毫克利培酮(n = 21)或2 - 20毫克氟哌啶醇(n = 20)治疗。通过阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评估精神病症状的改善情况来评价疗效。使用锥体外系症状评定量表、UKU副作用评定量表和临床实验室评估来评估安全性和耐受性。
两种治疗方法均能减轻精神病症状。随着试验进行,PANSS总分、阳性得分和一般精神病理学得分均下降,两组之间无显著差异。然而,利培酮组的PANSS阴性得分改善优于氟哌啶醇组。利培酮治疗患者的抗精神病药物耐受性在统计学上显著优于氟哌啶醇治疗患者。两组最常见的不良反应是震颤和僵硬。抗精神病药物、其剂量和高催乳素血症可预测短期锥体外系副作用。血清催乳素水平可预测帕金森症和运动障碍的严重程度。然而,运动障碍最好由抗精神病药物剂量预测。肌张力障碍的预测因素是抗精神病药物本身。调整药物剂量和联合用药后,副作用可明显改善。
本研究表明,在精神分裂症的12周治疗中,利培酮在改善阴性症状方面优于氟哌啶醇,且耐受性更好。血清催乳素水平可预测帕金森症和运动障碍的严重程度。