Chouinard G, Jones B, Remington G, Bloom D, Addington D, MacEwan G W, Labelle A, Beauclair L, Arnott W
Hôpital Louis-H. Lafontaine, Montréal, Canada.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Feb;13(1):25-40.
In a double-blind study, 135 inpatients with a diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with one of six parallel treatments: risperidone (a new central 5-hydroxytryptamine2 and dopamine D2 antagonist), 2, 6, 10, 16 mg/day; haloperidol, 20 mg/day; or placebo, after a single-blind placebo washout period. Doses were increased in fixed increments up to a fixed maintenance dose reached after 1 week. On the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness and Improvement, all active medications were superior to placebo except for risperidone (2 mg) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement. On the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score and positive subscale, superiority to placebo was observed for all treatment groups except for haloperidol and risperidone (2 mg), which tended to be superior to placebo on total PANSS and the positive subscale, respectively. On the PANSS negative subscale, only risperidone (6 mg/day) was significantly better than placebo. Risperidone (6 mg) was superior to haloperidol on the total PANSS, General Psychopathology, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale subscales. Although there was a linear increase in parkinsonism with increasing risperidone dosage, there were no statistically significant differences between risperidone (2, 6, and 16 mg/day) and placebo. At doses of 6 to 16 mg, risperidone displayed a marked antidyskinetic effect compared with placebo. This effect was more pronounced in patients with severe dyskinesia. By contrast, haloperidol produced significantly more parkinsonism than placebo and risperidone (2, 6 and 16 mg), with no effect on tardive dyskinesia. These data suggest that risperidone, at the optimal therapeutic dose of 6 mg/day, produced significant improvement in both positive and negative symptoms without an increase in drug-induced parkinsonian symptoms and with a significant beneficial effect on tardive dyskinesia.
在一项双盲研究中,135名被诊断为慢性精神分裂症的住院患者在经过单盲安慰剂洗脱期后,被随机分配接受以下六种平行治疗之一,为期8周:利培酮(一种新型中枢5-羟色胺2和多巴胺D2拮抗剂),剂量为2、6、10、16毫克/天;氟哌啶醇,20毫克/天;或安慰剂。剂量以固定增量增加,直至1周后达到固定维持剂量。在临床总体印象-疾病严重程度和改善情况方面,除利培酮(2毫克)在临床总体印象-改善情况上外,所有活性药物均优于安慰剂。在阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分及阳性分量表上,除氟哌啶醇和利培酮(2毫克)外,所有治疗组均显示优于安慰剂,氟哌啶醇和利培酮(2毫克)在PANSS总分和阳性分量表上分别倾向于优于安慰剂。在PANSS阴性分量表上,只有利培酮(6毫克/天)显著优于安慰剂。利培酮(6毫克)在PANSS总分、总体精神病理学和简明精神病评定量表分量表上优于氟哌啶醇。虽然随着利培酮剂量增加帕金森症呈线性增加,但利培酮(2、6和16毫克/天)与安慰剂之间无统计学显著差异。在6至16毫克剂量时,与安慰剂相比,利培酮显示出明显的抗运动障碍作用。这种作用在严重运动障碍患者中更为明显。相比之下,氟哌啶醇产生的帕金森症明显多于安慰剂和利培酮(2、6和16毫克),对迟发性运动障碍无影响。这些数据表明,利培酮在6毫克/天的最佳治疗剂量下,能显著改善阳性和阴性症状,且不会增加药物诱导的帕金森症状,并对迟发性运动障碍有显著有益作用。