Möller Hans-Jürgen, Riedel Michael, Jäger Markus, Wickelmaier Florian, Maier Wolfgang, Kühn Kai-Uwe, Buchkremer Gerhard, Heuser Isabella, Klosterkötter Joachim, Gastpar Markus, Braus Dieter F, Schlösser Ralf, Schneider Frank, Ohmann Christian, Riesbeck Mathias, Gaebel Wolfgang
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Nov;11(7):985-97. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708008791. Epub 2008 May 9.
Patients with first-episode schizophrenia appear to respond to lower doses of neuroleptics, and to be more sensitive to developing extrapyramidal side-effects. The authors therefore compared in such patients the efficacy and extrapyramidal tolerability of comparatively low dosages of the atypical neuroleptic risperidone and of the conventional neuroleptic haloperidol. Risperidone was hypothesized to have better extrapyramidal tolerability and efficacy in treating negative symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive risperidone (n=143) or haloperidol (n=146) for 8 wk. The primary efficacy criterion was the estimated difference in the mean change in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) negative score between treatment groups; secondary efficacy criteria were changes on the PANSS total score and other PANSS subscores, and several other measures of psychopathology and general functioning. The primary tolerability criterion was the difference in baseline-adjusted occurrence rates of extrapyramidal side-effects measured with the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) compared between treatment groups. The main hypothesis was that risperidone would be superior in terms of improving negative symptoms and lowering the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms. Secondary tolerability criteria were the other extrapyramidal symptoms, measured with the Hillside Akathisia Scale (HAS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). The average mean daily doses were 3.8 mg (s.d.=1.5) for risperidone and 3.7 mg (s.d.=1.5) for haloperidol. There were similar, significant improvements in both treatment groups in the primary and secondary efficacy criteria. At week 8 nearly all scores of extrapyramidal side-effects indicated a significantly higher prevalence of extrapyramidal side-effects with haloperidol than with risperidone [SAS: risperidone 36.5% of patients; haloperidol 51.5% of patients; likelihood ratio test, chi2(1)=7.8, p=0.005]. There were significantly fewer drop-outs [risperidone n=55, drop-out rate=38.5%; haloperidol n=79, drop-out rate=54.1%, chi2(1)=7.1, p=0.009] and a longer non-discontinuation time [risperidone: average of 50.8 d to drop-out; haloperidol: average of 44.0 d to drop-out; log rank test, chi2(1)=6.4, p=0.011] in the risperidone group. Risperidone and haloperidol appear to be equally effective in treating negative and other symptoms of first-episode schizophrenia. Risperidone has better extrapyramidal tolerability and treatment retention rate than the equivalent dose of haloperidol in these patients.
首发精神分裂症患者似乎对较低剂量的抗精神病药物有反应,且更容易出现锥体外系副作用。因此,作者比较了在这类患者中,相对低剂量的非典型抗精神病药物利培酮与传统抗精神病药物氟哌啶醇的疗效及锥体外系耐受性。研究假设利培酮在治疗阴性症状方面具有更好的锥体外系耐受性和疗效。患者在双盲条件下被随机分配接受利培酮(n = 143)或氟哌啶醇(n = 146)治疗8周。主要疗效标准是治疗组间阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)阴性评分的平均变化估计差异;次要疗效标准是PANSS总分及其他PANSS子量表的变化,以及其他一些精神病理学和总体功能指标。主要耐受性标准是治疗组间用辛普森 - 安格斯量表(SAS)测量的经基线调整的锥体外系副作用发生率差异。主要假设是利培酮在改善阴性症状和降低锥体外系症状风险方面更具优势。次要耐受性标准是用山坡静坐不能量表(HAS)和异常不自主运动量表(AIMS)测量的其他锥体外系症状。利培酮的平均每日剂量为3.8毫克(标准差 = 1.5),氟哌啶醇为3.7毫克(标准差 = 1.5)。在主要和次要疗效标准方面,两个治疗组均有相似且显著的改善。在第8周时,几乎所有锥体外系副作用评分均表明,氟哌啶醇组的锥体外系副作用患病率显著高于利培酮组[SAS:利培酮组36.5%的患者;氟哌啶醇组51.5%的患者;似然比检验,卡方(1)=7.8,p = 0.005]。利培酮组的退出率显著更低[利培酮n = 55,退出率 = 38.5%;氟哌啶醇n = 79,退出率 = 54.1%,卡方(1)=7.1,p = 0.009],且无停药时间更长[利培酮:平均停药时间为50.8天;氟哌啶醇:平均停药时间为44.0天;对数秩检验,卡方(1)=6.4,p = 0.011]。利培酮和氟哌啶醇在治疗首发精神分裂症的阴性及其他症状方面似乎同样有效。在这些患者中,利培酮比同等剂量的氟哌啶醇具有更好的锥体外系耐受性和治疗保留率。