Chung Susana T L, Legge Gordon E, Cheung Sing-hang
College of Optometry, University of Houston, 505 J.D. Armistead Bldg, Houston, TX 77204-2020, USA.
Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(7):695-709. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.028.
Visual-span profiles are plots of letter-recognition accuracy as a function of letter position left or right of the midline. Previously, we have shown that contraction of these profiles in peripheral vision can account for slow reading speed in peripheral vision. In this study, we asked two questions: (1) can we modify visual-span profiles through training on letter-recognition, and if so, (2) are these changes accompanied by changes in reading speed? Eighteen normally sighted observers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: training at 10 degrees in the upper visual field, training at 10 degrees in the lower visual field and a no-training control group. We compared observers' characteristics of reading (maximum reading speed and critical print size) and visual-span profiles (peak amplitude and bits of information transmitted) before and after training, and at trained and untrained retinal locations (10 degrees upper and lower visual fields). Reading speeds were measured for six print sizes at each retinal location, using the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. Visual-span profiles were measured using a trigram letter-recognition task, for a letter size equivalent to 1.4x the critical print size for reading. Training consisted of the repeated measurement of 20 visual-span profiles (over four consecutive days) in either the upper or lower visual field. We also tracked the changes in performance in a sub-group of observers for up to three months following training. We found that the visual-span profiles can be expanded (bits of information transmitted increased by 6 bits) through training with a letter-recognition task, and that there is an accompanying increase (41%) in the maximum reading speed. These improvements transferred, to a large extent, from the trained to an untrained retinal location, and were retained, to a large extent, for at least three months following training. Our results are consistent with the view that the visual span is a bottleneck on reading speed, but a bottleneck that can be increased with practice.
视觉广度剖面图是字母识别准确率随字母在中线左侧或右侧位置变化的曲线图。此前,我们已经表明,周边视觉中这些剖面图的收缩可以解释周边视觉中阅读速度较慢的现象。在本研究中,我们提出了两个问题:(1)我们能否通过字母识别训练来改变视觉广度剖面图,如果可以,(2)这些变化是否伴随着阅读速度的改变?18名视力正常的观察者被随机分配到三个组中的一组:上视野10度处训练组、下视野10度处训练组和无训练对照组。我们比较了观察者在训练前后以及训练和未训练视网膜位置(上、下视野10度)的阅读特征(最大阅读速度和临界印刷字体大小)和视觉广度剖面图(峰值幅度和传输的信息量)。使用快速序列视觉呈现范式,在每个视网膜位置测量六种印刷字体大小下的阅读速度。使用三字母识别任务测量视觉广度剖面图,字母大小相当于阅读临界印刷字体大小的1.4倍。训练包括在上视野或下视野中重复测量20个视觉广度剖面图(连续四天)。我们还跟踪了一组观察者在训练后长达三个月的表现变化。我们发现,通过字母识别任务训练可以扩展视觉广度剖面图(传输的信息量增加6比特),并且最大阅读速度随之提高(41%)。这些改善在很大程度上从训练位置转移到未训练的视网膜位置,并且在训练后至少三个月内很大程度上得以保持。我们的结果与以下观点一致,即视觉广度是阅读速度的一个瓶颈,但这个瓶颈可以通过练习来扩大。