Suppr超能文献

左胸廓内动脉-桡动脉复合移植物作为老年患者心肌血运重建的首选技术:一项前瞻性随机评估

Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation.

作者信息

Muneretto Claudio, Bisleri Gianluigi, Negri Alberto, Manfredi Jacopo, Carone Enrico, Morgan Jeffrey A, Metra Marco, Dei Cas Livio

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Brescia Medical School, Italy.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;127(1):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients remains a debated issue. We evaluated the potential advantages of the use of left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafts in elderly patients.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 160 patients aged more than 70 years scheduled to undergo isolated myocardial revascularization. Patients were assigned at random to group 1, 80 patients undergoing total arterial revascularization (left internal thoracic artery on left anterior descending coronary artery plus radial artery), or group 2, 80 patients undergoing standard coronary artery bypass graft surgery (left internal thoracic artery on left anterior descending coronary artery plus saphenous veins). The radial artery was used in all cases as a composite Y-graft.

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics and risk factors (EuroSCORE: group 1 = 7.9 vs group 2 = 8.1), number of grafted coronary vessels (group 1 = 2.4 vs group 2 = 2.5), aortic crossclamping time (group 1 = 37 +/- 7 minutes vs group 2 = 38 +/- 7 minutes), ventilation time (group 1 = 22 +/- 12 hours vs group 2 = 23 +/- 11 hours), intensive care unit stay (group 1 = 39 +/- 10 hours vs group 2 = 40 +/- 9 hours), and hospital mortality (group 1 = 3.8% vs group 2 = 5%) were comparable between the groups. Comparison between the 2 groups in terms of early postoperative complications showed a higher incidence of cerebrovascular accidents in group 2 (group 1 = 0 patients vs group 2 = 4 patients, 5%). At a mean follow-up of 16 +/- 3 months, patients in group 1 showed superior clinical results with a lower incidence of graft occlusion (group 1 = 2 vs group 2 = 11; P =.06) and angina recurrence (group 1 = 2 patients vs group 2 = 12 patients; P =.03). Multivariate analysis identified saphenous vein grafts as independent predictors for graft occlusion and angina recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts proved to be a safe procedure in elderly patients. It improved the clinical outcome, providing a significantly higher graft patency rate and a lower incidence of late cardiac events.

摘要

目的

老年患者心肌血运重建的首选技术仍是一个有争议的问题。我们评估了在老年患者中使用左胸廓内动脉 - 桡动脉复合移植物与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术相比的潜在优势。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了160例年龄超过70岁、计划接受单纯心肌血运重建的患者。患者被随机分配到第1组,80例接受全动脉血运重建(左胸廓内动脉至左前降支冠状动脉加桡动脉),或第2组,80例接受标准冠状动脉旁路移植手术(左胸廓内动脉至左前降支冠状动脉加隐静脉)。在所有病例中,桡动脉均用作复合Y形移植物。

结果

两组患者的术前特征和危险因素(欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统评分:第1组 = 7.9 vs第2组 = 8.1)、移植冠状动脉血管数量(第1组 = 2.4 vs第2组 = 2.5)、主动脉阻断时间(第1组 = 37±7分钟 vs第2组 = 38±7分钟)、通气时间(第1组 = 22±12小时 vs第2组 = 23±11小时)、重症监护病房停留时间(第1组 = 39±10小时 vs第2组 = 40±9小时)和医院死亡率(第1组 = 3.8% vs第2组 = 5%)相当。两组术后早期并发症的比较显示,第2组脑血管意外的发生率更高(第1组 = 0例患者 vs第2组 = 4例患者,5%)。在平均16±3个月的随访中,第1组患者的临床结果更好,移植物闭塞发生率更低(第1组 = 2例 vs第2组 = 11例;P = 0.06),心绞痛复发率更低(第1组 = 2例患者 vs第2组 = 12例患者;P = 0.03)。多因素分析确定隐静脉移植物是移植物闭塞和心绞痛复发的独立预测因素。

结论

左胸廓内动脉 - 桡动脉复合移植物在老年患者中被证明是一种安全的手术方法。它改善了临床结局,提供了显著更高的移植物通畅率和更低的晚期心脏事件发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验