• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥手术中桡动脉移植与大隐静脉移植:哪种血管移植物疗效更佳?

Radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass surgery : which conduit offers better efficacy?

作者信息

Zhang H, Wang Z W, Wu H B, Hu X P, Zhou Z, Xu P

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 99 Ziyang Road, 430060, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

Herz. 2014 Jun;39(4):458-65. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3848-5. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-013-3848-5
PMID:23784362
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the best therapeutic option for multivessel coronary artery diseases. The internal thoracic artery is usually used for the left anterior descending coronary artery. However, it is still not clear what the best conduit is for non-left anterior descending coronary arteries. This research sought to assess the efficacy of the radial artery versus the saphenous vein in this context.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for randomized clinical trials (RCT) published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. RCTs reporting angiographic comparisons and clinical events of the radial artery versus the saphenous vein were included.

RESULTS

Six trials (1,860 participants, 1,188 radial artery grafts, 1,178 saphenous vein grafts) were included in this review. The radial artery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of graft failure (p < 0.05) and of repeat coronary operation (p < 0.05). There was no significant trend toward decreased cardiac death and myocardial infarction with the use of a radial artery (p > 0.05; p > 0.05). As determined by the GRADE method, the evidence quality was low for repeat operation and very low for other variables.

CONCLUSION

The radial artery can be weakly recommended as a selective conduit but cannot always be considered better than the saphenous vein.

摘要

目的

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是多支冠状动脉疾病的最佳治疗选择。胸廓内动脉通常用于冠状动脉左前降支。然而,对于非左前降支冠状动脉,最佳的移植血管仍不明确。本研究旨在评估在此情况下桡动脉与大隐静脉的疗效。

方法

对发表在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆的随机临床试验(RCT)进行系统文献检索。纳入报告桡动脉与大隐静脉血管造影比较和临床事件的RCT。

结果

本综述纳入了6项试验(1860名参与者,1188例桡动脉移植,1178例大隐静脉移植)。桡动脉与移植失败发生率显著降低(p<0.05)和再次冠状动脉手术发生率显著降低(p<0.05)相关。使用桡动脉在心脏死亡和心肌梗死方面没有显著下降趋势(p>0.05;p>0.05)。根据GRADE方法确定,重复手术的证据质量低,其他变量的证据质量极低。

结论

桡动脉可作为一种选择性移植血管被弱推荐,但不能总是被认为优于大隐静脉。

相似文献

1
Radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass surgery : which conduit offers better efficacy?冠状动脉搭桥手术中桡动脉移植与大隐静脉移植:哪种血管移植物疗效更佳?
Herz. 2014 Jun;39(4):458-65. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3848-5. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
2
Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中桡动脉移植物与隐静脉移植物的比较:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 12;305(2):167-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1976.
3
Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries.非左前降支冠状动脉中桡动脉与隐静脉或右内乳动脉旁路移植桥的有效性的系统比较。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Apr;12(4):273-9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1000241.
4
Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术中的桡动脉或隐静脉移植物。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2069-2077. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716026. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft With Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后桡动脉桥与隐静脉桥对患者长期心血管结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 14;324(2):179-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8228.
6
The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.首选非接触式隐静脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术的第二移植物。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;96(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.102. Epub 2013 May 16.
7
Late outcomes after radial artery versus saphenous vein grafting during reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery.再次冠状动脉旁路移植手术中桡动脉与隐静脉桥的晚期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;139(6):1511-1518.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.068. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
8
Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Literature Review.桡动脉与隐静脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:文献综述。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Mar 22;21(5):36. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1112-1.
9
Angiographic outcomes of radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术桡动脉与隐静脉血管造影结果的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
10
Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition--which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis.桡动脉与隐静脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:四十年的竞争——哪种移植物具有更好的通畅率?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):208-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Radial Artery for CABG: An Update.桡动脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:更新。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Apr 7;2021:5528006. doi: 10.1155/2021/5528006. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing the Long-term Patency and Clinical Outcomes of Venous and Arterial Grafts Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-analysis.评估冠状动脉旁路移植术中使用的静脉和动脉移植物的长期通畅率及临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2019 Sep 16;11(9):e5670. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5670.
3
Short- and long-term results of radial artery and saphenous vein grafts in the right coronary system: a propensity-matched study.

本文引用的文献

1
Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study).冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年以上桡动脉和隐静脉通畅情况:RAPS(桡动脉通畅研究)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.037.
2
Comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein as composite grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.老年患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中桡动脉与大隐静脉复合移植物的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Korean Circ J. 2012 Feb;42(2):107-12. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2012.42.2.107. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
3
右冠状动脉系统中桡动脉和大隐静脉移植的短期和长期结果:一项倾向匹配研究。
Surg Today. 2017 Mar;47(3):335-343. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1396-3. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
The Same Angiographic Factors Predict Venous and Arterial Graft Patency: A Retrospective Study.相同的血管造影因素可预测静脉和动脉移植物通畅情况:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(1):e2068. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002068.
5
Comparison of endothelial function of coronary artery bypass grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: Which graft offers the best?糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者冠状动脉旁路移植血管内皮功能的比较:哪种移植物效果最佳?
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Aug;15(8):657-62. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5613.
2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉旁路移植手术指南。美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告。与美国胸外科协会、心血管麻醉医师协会和胸外科医师协会合作制定。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e123-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
4
Costs and quality of life associated with radial artery and saphenous vein cardiac bypass surgery: results from a Veterans Affairs multisite trial.与桡动脉和隐静脉心脏旁路手术相关的成本和生活质量:来自退伍军人事务部多地点试验的结果。
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):532-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
5
Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries.非左前降支冠状动脉中桡动脉与隐静脉或右内乳动脉旁路移植桥的有效性的系统比较。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Apr;12(4):273-9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1000241.
6
The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction.桡动脉通畅性和临床结局试验:设计、中期结果和未来方向。
Heart Lung Circ. 2011 Mar;20(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.01.001.
7
Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中桡动脉移植物与隐静脉移植物的比较:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 12;305(2):167-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1976.
8
Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition--which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis.桡动脉与隐静脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:四十年的竞争——哪种移植物具有更好的通畅率?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):208-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
9
Vascular reactivity and flow characteristics of radial artery and long saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts: a 5-year follow-up.桡动脉和大隐静脉冠状动脉旁路移植术后的血管反应性和血流特征:5 年随访。
Circulation. 2010 Aug 31;122(9):861-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887000. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
10
Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.桡动脉与右内乳动脉或隐静脉通畅率的 5 年以上比较:来自桡动脉通畅和临床结果试验的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;139(1):60-5; discussion 65-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.043.