Deo S V S, Bhutani Manisha, Shukla Nootan K, Raina Vinod, Rath Goura K, Purkayasth Joydeep
Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Surg Oncol. 2003 Dec;84(4):192-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.10323.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major problem in developing countries. While trials utilizing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate superior survival rates compared to historic controls, randomized studies evaluating the precise role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in LABC are lacking. In the present trial, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was compared against adjuvant chemotherapy to assess survival advantage in operable T4b N0-2 M0 breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 101 women with operable LABC (T4b N0-2 M0) were randomized. In arm A, 50 patients received 3 cycles of CEF chemotherapy before and 3 cycles following surgery. In arm B, 51 patients had primary surgery followed by 6 cycles of CEF chemotherapy. In both arms, loco-regional radiotherapy was given after completion of CEF. RESULTS: The response of primary tumor to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was 66%, complete response (CR) 14% and partial response (PR) 52%. Clinical nodal response occurred in 95% of node positive patients. Only two (4%) patients had pathologic CR both in tumor and axilla. There was a significant (P = 0.02) increase in incidence of pathologically negative nodes in arm A. At a median follow up of 25 months, there was no significant difference in overall and disease free survival (DFS) in both arms (P = 0.42 and 0.18). Patients showing a response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy had better DFS (P = 0.04) compared to those who had no response. CONCLUSIONS: Early results of the study indicate no survival benefit with the inclusion of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in LABC (T4b N0-2 M0). Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in significant down staging; good responders had a better DFS compared to those who did not respond.
背景与目的:局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)在发展中国家仍然是一个主要问题。虽然与历史对照相比,采用新辅助化疗的试验显示出更高的生存率,但缺乏评估新辅助化疗在LABC中确切作用的随机研究。在本试验中,将新辅助化疗与辅助化疗进行比较,以评估可手术的T4b N0-2 M0乳腺癌的生存优势。 方法:总共101例可手术的LABC(T4b N0-2 M0)女性患者被随机分组。A组50例患者在手术前接受3个周期的CEF化疗,手术后再接受3个周期的CEF化疗。B组51例患者先进行原发手术,然后接受6个周期的CEF化疗。两组在完成CEF化疗后均进行局部区域放疗。 结果:原发肿瘤对新辅助化疗的反应率为66%,完全缓解(CR)率为14%,部分缓解(PR)率为52%。95%的淋巴结阳性患者出现临床淋巴结反应。只有2例(4%)患者在肿瘤和腋窝均达到病理CR。A组病理阴性淋巴结的发生率显著增加(P = 0.02)。在中位随访25个月时,两组的总生存率和无病生存率(DFS)均无显著差异(P = 0.42和0.18)。与无反应的患者相比,对新辅助化疗有反应的患者DFS更好(P = 0.04)。 结论:该研究的早期结果表明,在LABC(T4b N0-2 M0)中加入新辅助化疗没有生存获益。新辅助化疗导致显著的降期;与无反应者相比,反应良好者的DFS更好。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019-4-26
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019-2-16