Grilo Carlos M, Becker Daniel F, Anez Luis Miguel, McGlashan Thomas H
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Feb;72(1):126-31. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.126.
This study examined diagnostic efficiency of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD). One hundred thirty monolingual Hispanic adults (90 men, 40 women) at an outpatient psychiatric and substance abuse clinic were assessed with the Spanish-Language Version of the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (C. M. Grilo, L. M. Anez, & T. H. McGlashan, 2003). The BPD diagnosis was determined by the best-estimate method. Diagnostic efficiency indices were calculated for all BPD criteria, for the entire study group, and separately by gender. Overall, the best exclusion criterion was affective instability, whereas suicidality or self-injury was the best inclusion criterion and the best predictor overall. These findings did not differ by gender, are similar to those reported elsewhere in the literature, and have implications for the refinement of diagnostic systems.
本研究考察了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的诊断标准的诊断效率。在一家门诊精神科和药物滥用诊所,对130名讲西班牙语的西班牙裔成年人(90名男性,40名女性)使用《DSM-IV人格障碍诊断访谈西班牙语版》(C.M. 格里洛、L.M. 阿内斯和T.H. 麦克格拉斯汉,2003年)进行了评估。BPD诊断采用最佳估计法确定。计算了所有BPD标准、整个研究组以及按性别分别计算的诊断效率指标。总体而言,最佳排除标准是情感不稳定,而自杀行为或自我伤害是最佳纳入标准和总体最佳预测指标。这些发现不存在性别差异,与文献中其他地方报道的结果相似,并且对诊断系统的完善具有启示意义。