Ulander Veli-Matti, Gissler Mika, Nuutila Mika, Ylikorkala Olavi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, and STAKES National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Feb;83(2):180-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00386.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of fetal presentation and mode of delivery on infant outcome in a nation-wide study.
In a retrospective observational cohort study, we compared, with the help of Finnish Medical Birth Register and other nation-wide registers, the short-term and long-term outcome of infants born by breech vaginal (n = 1270) or by vertex vaginal delivery (n = 128,683) or through planned cesarean section (CS) in breech (n = 1640) or vertex (n = 4997); the pregnancies were otherwise entirely normal.
One perinatal death occurred in the breech vaginal group and 23 deaths in the vertex vaginal group (p = 0.112), but none in either CS group. Breech vaginal delivery was associated with increased risk of Apgar scores 6 or less at age 1 min (OR 7.65, CI 6.41-9.12) and at age 5 min (OR 6.42, CI 4.36-9.45) as compared with vertex vaginal delivery. These odd ratios were also elevated (OR 4.59, CI 3.48-7.08 and OR 7.58, CI 3.09-18.66, respectively) when compared with breech planned CS. Yet the risk for birth trauma of infants in the breech vaginal group was smaller (OR 0.70, CI 0.51-0.96) than that in the vertex vaginal group but this risk was smallest in the planned CS groups. A number of other neonatal complications occurred equally commonly in each group. Breech infants born vaginally needed fewer admissions (OR 0.58, 0.47-0.72) to out-patient departments and the cumulative incidence of long-term morbidity in the breech vaginal group was smaller (OR 0.47, CI 0.28-0.80) to the age of 7 years than that in the breech planned CS. The maturity for starting school and school performance during the first two school years showed no dependence on mode of delivery.
Apart from Apgar suppression, elective vaginal delivery of a full-term breech fetus in highly selected pregnancies does not cause additional neonatal hazards as compared with full-term vertex deliveries. The immediate outcome was best for breech or vertex infants born through elective CSs.
本研究的目的是在一项全国性研究中比较胎儿先露和分娩方式对婴儿结局的影响。
在一项回顾性观察队列研究中,我们借助芬兰医学出生登记册和其他全国性登记册,比较了臀位经阴道分娩(n = 1270)、头位经阴道分娩(n = 128,683)、臀位计划性剖宫产(n = 1640)或头位计划性剖宫产(n = 4997)出生婴儿的短期和长期结局;这些妊娠在其他方面完全正常。
臀位经阴道分娩组发生1例围产期死亡,头位经阴道分娩组发生23例死亡(p = 0.112),但两组剖宫产组均无死亡。与头位经阴道分娩相比,臀位经阴道分娩与出生后1分钟(OR 7.65,CI 6.41 - 9.12)和5分钟(OR 6.42,CI 4.36 - 9.45)时Apgar评分≤6分的风险增加相关。与臀位计划性剖宫产相比,这些比值比也升高(分别为OR 4.59,CI 3.48 - 7.08和OR 7.58,CI 3.09 - 18.66)。然而,臀位经阴道分娩组婴儿的出生创伤风险(OR 0.70,CI 0.51 - 0.96)低于头位经阴道分娩组,但在计划性剖宫产组中该风险最小。其他一些新生儿并发症在每组中发生的频率相同。经阴道分娩的臀位婴儿门诊就诊次数较少(OR 0.58,0.47 - 0.72),且到7岁时臀位经阴道分娩组的长期发病率累积发生率低于臀位计划性剖宫产组(OR 0.47,CI 0.28 - 0.80)。入学成熟度和头两个学年的学业成绩与分娩方式无关。
除了Apgar评分受抑制外,在经过严格筛选的妊娠中,足月臀位胎儿选择性经阴道分娩与足月头位分娩相比,不会导致额外的新生儿风险。选择性剖宫产出生的臀位或头位婴儿的即刻结局最佳。