Zibaeenezhad M J, Mowla A, Sorbi M H
Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Angiology. 2004 Jan-Feb;55(1):17-20. doi: 10.1177/000331970405500103.
The benefits of anticoagulant therapy and antiplatelet agents in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) are well known. Administration of combined warfarin and aspirin (ASA) has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of coadministration of warfarin and ASA with administration of ASA alone on outcome of patients after MI. One hundred forty age- and sex-matched survivors of MI were randomized to receive either 100 mg/day ASA plus enough warfarin to reach a target: international normalized ratio of 2.5 (range: 2-3) (group A, n = 70), or only 100 mg/day ASA (group B, n = 70). The patients were examined for several variables including development of hemorrhage, reinfarction, and rehospitalization for 1 year post MI. Of the variables studied, minor hemorrhagic episodes were observed significantly (p = 0.002) more in group A than in group B patients. Rehospitalization and reinfarction rates, although occurring with lower frequencies in group A than in group B, did not reach the statistical significance level. In postmyocardial infarction patients, warfarin plus ASA did not provide a clinical benefit beyond that achievable with aspirin monotherapy, and for the observed markedly higher incidence of minor hemorrhage in combination therapy, antiplatelet therapy alone seems to be a more reasonable approach.
抗凝治疗和抗血小板药物在心肌梗死(MI)二级预防中的益处已广为人知。华法林与阿司匹林(ASA)联合用药的研究尚不充分。本研究的目的是比较华法林与ASA联合用药和单独使用ASA对MI后患者预后的影响。140例年龄和性别匹配的MI幸存者被随机分为两组:一组接受100mg/天的ASA加足量华法林,使国际标准化比值达到2.5(范围:2 - 3)(A组,n = 70);另一组仅接受100mg/天的ASA(B组,n = 70)。对患者进行了多项变量检查,包括MI后1年的出血情况、再梗死情况和再次住院情况。在研究的变量中,A组患者的轻微出血事件明显多于B组(p = 0.002)。再住院率和再梗死率虽然在A组中的发生率低于B组,但未达到统计学显著水平。在心肌梗死后患者中,华法林加ASA并未比单独使用阿司匹林带来更多临床益处,且联合治疗中观察到轻微出血的发生率明显更高,因此单独抗血小板治疗似乎是更合理的方法。