Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后使用华法林、阿司匹林或两者联用。

Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Hurlen Mette, Abdelnoor Michael, Smith Pål, Erikssen Jan, Arnesen Harald

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 26;347(13):969-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020496.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction is well established. Although the available literature suggests that warfarin is superior to aspirin, aspirin is currently the more widely used drug. We studied the efficacy and safety of warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction.

METHODS

In a randomized, multicenter trial in 3630 patients, 1216 received warfarin (in a dose intended to achieve an international normalized ratio [INR] of 2.8 to 4.2), 1206 received aspirin (160 mg daily), and 1208 received aspirin (75 mg daily) combined with warfarin (in a dose intended to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 2.5). The mean duration of observation was four years.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, a composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or thromboembolic cerebral stroke, occurred in 241 of 1206 patients receiving aspirin (20.0 percent), 203 of 1216 receiving warfarin (16.7 percent; rate ratio as compared with aspirin, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.95; P=0.03), and 181 of 1208 receiving warfarin and aspirin (15.0 percent; rate ratio as compared with aspirin, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.83; P=0.001). The difference between the two groups receiving warfarin was not statistically significant. Episodes of major, nonfatal bleeding were observed in 0.62 percent of patients per treatment-year in both groups receiving warfarin and in 0.17 percent of patients receiving aspirin (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin, in combination with aspirin or given alone, was superior to aspirin alone in reducing the incidence of composite events after an acute myocardial infarction but was associated with a higher risk of bleeding.

摘要

背景

抗血栓治疗在心肌梗死后二级预防中的作用已得到充分确立。尽管现有文献表明华法林优于阿司匹林,但阿司匹林目前是使用更为广泛的药物。我们研究了心肌梗死后使用华法林、阿司匹林或两者联合使用的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项针对3630例患者的随机多中心试验中,1216例患者接受华法林治疗(剂量旨在使国际标准化比值[INR]达到2.8至4.2),1206例患者接受阿司匹林治疗(每日160毫克),1208例患者接受阿司匹林(每日75毫克)联合华法林治疗(剂量旨在使INR达到2.0至2.5)。平均观察期为四年。

结果

主要结局为死亡、非致命性再梗死或血栓栓塞性脑卒中等复合事件,接受阿司匹林治疗的1206例患者中有241例发生(20.0%),接受华法林治疗的1216例患者中有203例发生(16.7%;与阿司匹林相比的率比为0.81;95%置信区间为0.69至0.95;P = 0.03),接受华法林和阿司匹林联合治疗的1208例患者中有181例发生(15.0%;与阿司匹林相比的率比为0.71;95%置信区间为0.60至0.83;P = 0.001)。接受华法林治疗的两组之间的差异无统计学意义。在接受华法林治疗的两组中,每治疗年有0.62%的患者发生严重非致命性出血事件,而接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中这一比例为0.17%(P < 0.001)。

结论

华法林联合阿司匹林或单独使用,在降低急性心肌梗死后复合事件发生率方面优于单独使用阿司匹林,但出血风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验