Arcavi Lidia, Behar Solomon, Caspi Avraham, Reshef Naama, Boyko Valentina, Knobler Hilla
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Am Heart J. 2004 Feb;147(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.013.
A high fasting glucose level may be a marker not only for microvascular complications, but also for macrovascular complications. We evaluated the clinical significance of a high fasting glucose level (> or =110 mg/dL), detected either at baseline or during follow-up, in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study.
The BIP study was a secondary prevention prospective double-blind study comparing bezafibrate to placebo. A total of 3122 patients with documented coronary artery heart disease who were aged 45 to 74 years and had a total cholesterol level between 180 and 250 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < or =180 mg/dL, a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < or =45 mg/dL, a triglyceride level < or =300 mg/dL, and a fasting glucose < or =160 mg/dL were randomized to receive 400 mg of bezafibrate daily or placebo.
The primary end point of the BIP study was fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or sudden death. Secondary end points included hospitalization for unstable angina, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting. At baseline, 330 patients (11%) had diabetes mellitus, and 293 patients (9%) had an impaired fasting blood glucose level (IFG). During 6.2 years of follow-up, diabetes mellitus developed in 186 patients (6%), IFG developed in 366 patients (12%), and 62% of patients remained with normal fasting glucose levels (NFG). Patients with diabetes mellitus and IFG both at baseline or developing during follow-up had a significantly higher rate of secondary end points than paients with NFG (P <.0001). Bezafibrate treatment reduced secondary end points only in patients with NFG (P =.04).
Diabetes mellitus and IFG were common in the BIP study and were predictive of a worse clinical outcome that was not attenuated with bezafibrate treatment.
空腹血糖水平升高不仅可能是微血管并发症的标志物,也可能是大血管并发症的标志物。在苯扎贝特预防心肌梗死(BIP)研究中,我们评估了在基线期或随访期间检测到的空腹血糖水平升高(≥110mg/dL)的临床意义。
BIP研究是一项比较苯扎贝特与安慰剂的二级预防前瞻性双盲研究。共有3122例年龄在45至74岁之间、总胆固醇水平在180至250mg/dL之间、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平≤180mg/dL、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平≤45mg/dL、甘油三酯水平≤300mg/dL且空腹血糖≤160mg/dL的冠心病患者被随机分为每日接受400mg苯扎贝特或安慰剂治疗。
BIP研究的主要终点是致命性心肌梗死、非致命性心肌梗死或猝死。次要终点包括不稳定型心绞痛住院、经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术和冠状动脉旁路移植术。基线时,330例患者(11%)患有糖尿病,293例患者(9%)空腹血糖受损(IFG)。在6.2年的随访期间,186例患者(6%)发生糖尿病,366例患者(12%)发生IFG,62%的患者空腹血糖水平保持正常(NFG)。基线时或随访期间同时患有糖尿病和IFG的患者次要终点发生率显著高于NFG患者(P<0.0001)。苯扎贝特治疗仅在NFG患者中降低了次要终点发生率(P=0.04)。
在BIP研究中,糖尿病和IFG很常见,并且预示着更差的临床结局,而苯扎贝特治疗并不能减轻这种结局。