Suppr超能文献

空腹血糖水平升高作为冠心病患者临床预后较差的预测指标:来自苯扎贝特预防心肌梗死(BIP)研究的结果。

High fasting glucose levels as a predictor of worse clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study.

作者信息

Arcavi Lidia, Behar Solomon, Caspi Avraham, Reshef Naama, Boyko Valentina, Knobler Hilla

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2004 Feb;147(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A high fasting glucose level may be a marker not only for microvascular complications, but also for macrovascular complications. We evaluated the clinical significance of a high fasting glucose level (> or =110 mg/dL), detected either at baseline or during follow-up, in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study.

METHODS

The BIP study was a secondary prevention prospective double-blind study comparing bezafibrate to placebo. A total of 3122 patients with documented coronary artery heart disease who were aged 45 to 74 years and had a total cholesterol level between 180 and 250 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < or =180 mg/dL, a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < or =45 mg/dL, a triglyceride level < or =300 mg/dL, and a fasting glucose < or =160 mg/dL were randomized to receive 400 mg of bezafibrate daily or placebo.

RESULTS

The primary end point of the BIP study was fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or sudden death. Secondary end points included hospitalization for unstable angina, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting. At baseline, 330 patients (11%) had diabetes mellitus, and 293 patients (9%) had an impaired fasting blood glucose level (IFG). During 6.2 years of follow-up, diabetes mellitus developed in 186 patients (6%), IFG developed in 366 patients (12%), and 62% of patients remained with normal fasting glucose levels (NFG). Patients with diabetes mellitus and IFG both at baseline or developing during follow-up had a significantly higher rate of secondary end points than paients with NFG (P <.0001). Bezafibrate treatment reduced secondary end points only in patients with NFG (P =.04).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes mellitus and IFG were common in the BIP study and were predictive of a worse clinical outcome that was not attenuated with bezafibrate treatment.

摘要

背景

空腹血糖水平升高不仅可能是微血管并发症的标志物,也可能是大血管并发症的标志物。在苯扎贝特预防心肌梗死(BIP)研究中,我们评估了在基线期或随访期间检测到的空腹血糖水平升高(≥110mg/dL)的临床意义。

方法

BIP研究是一项比较苯扎贝特与安慰剂的二级预防前瞻性双盲研究。共有3122例年龄在45至74岁之间、总胆固醇水平在180至250mg/dL之间、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平≤180mg/dL、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平≤45mg/dL、甘油三酯水平≤300mg/dL且空腹血糖≤160mg/dL的冠心病患者被随机分为每日接受400mg苯扎贝特或安慰剂治疗。

结果

BIP研究的主要终点是致命性心肌梗死、非致命性心肌梗死或猝死。次要终点包括不稳定型心绞痛住院、经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术和冠状动脉旁路移植术。基线时,330例患者(11%)患有糖尿病,293例患者(9%)空腹血糖受损(IFG)。在6.2年的随访期间,186例患者(6%)发生糖尿病,366例患者(12%)发生IFG,62%的患者空腹血糖水平保持正常(NFG)。基线时或随访期间同时患有糖尿病和IFG的患者次要终点发生率显著高于NFG患者(P<0.0001)。苯扎贝特治疗仅在NFG患者中降低了次要终点发生率(P=0.04)。

结论

在BIP研究中,糖尿病和IFG很常见,并且预示着更差的临床结局,而苯扎贝特治疗并不能减轻这种结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验